Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7670E9FA02C for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:38:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14137-07 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:38:40 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from exprod6og56.obsmtp.com (exprod6og56.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.208]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 996E19F9FE1 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:38:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from source ([63.240.6.47]) by exprod6ob56.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:38:01 PST Received: from 172.16.1.114 by mail.Mi8.com with ESMTP (- Welcome to Mi8 Corporation www.Mi8.com (D1)); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:37:55 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: 241911D6-425B-44B9-A073-E3FE0F8FC774 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.164]) by d01smtp07.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 13:37:54 -0500 Received: from 69.181.100.71 ([69.181.100.71]) by MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ( [172.16.1.190]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ( [172.16.1.106]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 18:37:54 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:37:51 -0800 Subject: Re: Looking for hw suggestions for high concurrency From: "Luke Lonergan" To: "Cosimo Streppone" , "Postgresql Performance list" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [PERFORM] Looking for hw suggestions for high concurrency OLTP app Thread-Index: AccdU3ZxtQZQh4lGEdu/8AAWy4o9DA== In-Reply-To: <457D86C9.10103@streppone.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2006 18:37:54.0478 (UTC) FILETIME=[78845CE0:01C71D53] X-WSS-ID: 69637A094NO3976519-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200612/252 X-Sequence-Number: 22308 The Sun X4600 is very good for this, the V40z is actually EOL so I'd stay away from it. You can currently do 8 dual core CPUs with the X4600 and 128GB of RAM and soon you should be able to do 8 quad core CPUs and 256GB of RAM. - Luke On 12/11/06 8:26 AM, "Cosimo Streppone" wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get suggestions from all you out there for > a new Postgresql server that will replace an existing one. > > My performance analysis shows very *low* iowaits, > and very high loads at times of peak system activity. > The average concurrent processes number is 3/4, with peaks of 10/15. > *Sustained* system load varies from 1.5 to 4, while peak load > reaches 20 and above, always with low iowait%. > I see this as a clear sign of more processors power need. > > I'm aware of the context-switching storm problem, but here > the cs stays well under 50,000, so I think it's not the problem > here. > > Current machine is an Acer Altos R700 (2 Xeon 2.8 Ghz, 4 Gb RAM), > similar to this one (R710): > http://www.acer.co.uk/acereuro/page9.do?sp=page4&dau34.oid=7036&UserCtxParam=0 > &GroupCtxParam=0&dctx1=17&CountryISOCtxParam=UK&LanguageISOCtxParam=en&ctx3=-1 > &ctx4=United+Kingdom&crc=334044639 > > So, I'm looking for advice on a mid-range OLTP server with > the following (flexible) requirements: > > - 4 physical processors expandable to 8 (dual core preferred), > either Intel or AMD > - 8 Gb RAM exp. to at least 32 Gb > - Compatibility with Acer S300 External storage enclosure. > The "old" server uses that, and it is boxed with 15krpm hdds > in RAID-10, which do perfectly well their job. > The enclosure is connected via 2 x LSI Logic PCI U320 controllers > - On-site, same-day hardware support contract > - Rack mount > > Machines we're evaluating currently include: > - Acer Altos R910 > - Sun Fire V40Z, > - HP Integrity RX4640 > - IBM eServer 460 > > Experiences on these machines? > Other suggestions? > > Thanks.