Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB96F9FBC96 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49914-03 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:20 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from exprod6og53.obsmtp.com (exprod6og53.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.187]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248A29FBC44 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 14:24:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from source ([63.240.6.46]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob53.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:24:16 PST Received: from 172.16.1.148 by mail.mi8.com with ESMTP (- Welcome to Mi8 Corporation www.Mi8.com (D2)); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:23:40 -0500 X-Server-Uuid: 7829E76E-BB9E-4995-8473-3C0929DF7DD1 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.164]) by D01SMTP05.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:23:40 -0500 Received: from 63.80.24.130 ([63.80.24.130]) by MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ( [172.16.1.190]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ( [172.16.1.134]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:23:39 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 10:23:38 -0800 Subject: Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? From: "Luke Lonergan" To: "Merlin Moncure" cc: "Krishna Kumar" , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [PERFORM] Benchmarking PGSQL? Thread-Index: AcdQZT7dfZkL1LxYEdu7eQAWy4o9DA== In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2007 18:23:40.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[4035DFE0:01C75065] X-WSS-ID: 69CD8C2632K10227880-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200702/157 X-Sequence-Number: 23211 Hi Merlin, On 2/14/07 8:20 AM, "Merlin Moncure" wrote: > I am curious what is your take on the maximum insert performance, in > mb/sec of large bytea columns (toasted), and how much if any greenplum > was able to advance this over the baseline. I am asking on behalf of > another interested party. Interested in numbers broken down per core > on 8 core quad system and also aggreate. Our approach is to attach a segment to each core, so we scale INSERT linearly on number of cores. So the per core limit we live with is the 10-20MB/s observed here. We'd like to improve that so that we get better performance with smaller machines. We have demonstrated insert performance of 670 MB/s, 2.4TB/hour for non-toasted columns using 3 load machines against 120 cores. This rate was load machine limited. WRT toasted bytea columns we haven't done any real benchmarking of those. Do you have a canned benchmark we can run? - Luke