Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B3464FFC0 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:58:00 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37516-03 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:57:54 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from exprod6og115.obsmtp.com (exprod6og115.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.35]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6326864FF27 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:57:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from source ([63.240.6.3]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob115.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:57:54 PDT Received: from D01SMTP04.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.243]) by Outbound02.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:57:54 -0400 Received: from MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.165]) by D01SMTP04.Mi8.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:57:53 -0400 Received: from 67.188.136.165 ([67.188.136.165]) by MI8NYCMAIL08.Mi8.com ([172.16.1.190]) via Exchange Front-End Server mi8owa.mi8.com ([172.16.1.108]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:57:53 +0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.11.0.080522 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:57:52 -0700 Subject: Re: Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench) From: Luke Lonergan To: Stephane Bailliez CC: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [PERFORM] Performance on Sun Fire X4150 x64 (dd, bonnie++, pgbench) Thread-Index: AcjrD0Hh/Tmjb6ziTquG5xEyv3+XnwAAJmjP In-Reply-To: <48844E7A.9050208@gmail.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2008 08:57:53.0680 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC850100:01C8EB0F] X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/170 X-Sequence-Number: 30770 Hi Stephane, On 7/21/08 1:53 AM, "Stephane Bailliez" wrote: >> I'd suggest RAID5, or even better, configure all eight disks as a JBOD >> in the RAID adapter and run ZFS RAIDZ. You would then expect to get >> about 7 x 80 = 560 MB/s on your single query. >> > Do you have a particular controller and disk hardware configuration in > mind when you're suggesting RAID5 ? > My understanding was it was more difficult to find the right hardware to > get performance on RAID5 compared to RAID10. If you're running RAIDZ on ZFS, the controller you have should be fine. Just configure the HW RAID controller to treat the disks as JBOD (eight individual disks), then make a single RAIDZ zpool of the eight disks. This will run them in a robust SW RAID within Solaris. The fault management is superior to what you would otherwise have in your HW RAID and the performance should be much better. - Luke