public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: milist ujang <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: BDR, wal sender, high system cpu, mutex_lock_common
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 06:07:06 +0700
Message-ID: <CACG9ogzm-x3VP-7bBnKh-j-5W=wZ0UxwPvgtWAu=_icaHKgUFA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
Hi all,
I've an environment 9.4 + bdr:
PostgreSQL 9.4.4 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian
4.7.2-5) 4.7.2, 64-bit
kernel version:
3.2.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.2.65-1 x86_64 GNU/Linux
This is consolidation databases, in this machine there are around 250+ wal
sender processes.
top output revealed high system cpu:
%Cpu(s): 1.4 us, 49.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 48.8 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si,
0.0 st
profiling cpu with perf:
perf top -e cpu-clock
Events: 142K cpu-clock
82.37% [kernel] [k] __mutex_lock_common.isra.5
4.49% [kernel] [k] do_raw_spin_lock
2.23% [kernel] [k] mutex_lock
2.16% [kernel] [k] mutex_unlock
2.12% [kernel] [k] arch_local_irq_restore
1.73% postgres [.] ValidXLogRecord
0.87% [kernel] [k] __mutex_unlock_slowpath
0.78% [kernel] [k] arch_local_irq_enable
0.63% [kernel] [k] sys_recvfrom
finally get which processes (wal senders) that are using mutexes:
perf top -e task-clock -p 55382
Events: 697 task-clock
88.08% [kernel] [k] __mutex_lock_common.isra.5
3.27% [kernel] [k] do_raw_spin_lock
2.34% [kernel] [k] arch_local_irq_restore
2.10% postgres [.] ValidXLogRecord
1.87% [kernel] [k] mutex_unlock
1.87% [kernel] [k] mutex_lock
0.47% [kernel] [k] sys_recvfrom
I think bdr is only reading wal file (current state is we behind current
wal lsn),
so why reading wal file needs mutex?
I wonder, is there kernel version has better handling mutexes?
--
regards
ujang jaenudin | DBA Consultant (Freelancer)
http://ora62.wordpress.com
http://id.linkedin.com/pub/ujang-jaenudin/12/64/bab
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BDR, wal sender, high system cpu, mutex_lock_common
In-Reply-To: <CACG9ogzm-x3VP-7bBnKh-j-5W=wZ0UxwPvgtWAu=_icaHKgUFA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox