Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGyqt-0007BE-ST for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:45:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGyqt-0006jR-16 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:45:51 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:7903:4::125]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGyqr-0006jK-MS for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:45:49 +0000 Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WGyqM-0005mI-KJ for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 22:45:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id fp1so3865740pdb.23 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:45:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=o/hGRSNYy34WNa7cC4L/WcbWev2MD1/EBMJ7/knSQ0k=; b=rXIGYmzrYMzbj11x9drpLUfa57Vvb9P2ks51Ct5+wmdUQvTkPUwhbdolzMBCjFbmqM pgCXkDzk7gmYV7Kpq/Tea69Yuxn+FXpyj7qZptpgReLZmFhtQ61wtvisxHukUvBjkIiC sdK1hWyKvz41AxsSno6aWC58xk8j6nt/HNiDyE3d80wymdLuL4/RYPPvnDVKBv/M5bEU 8ObYXTrD10PqAOi6bhhKI8xw8JEgp4qR+Md2JOdMe67Ywsh8Imor6MgmKnCbAe31zkZP Y6Xz2kByXPSJrOBI6TCDKF6mhBdVyhg/+6z3svbsy69NS42H6Exocz5lk3OwgzRrSBzR JZ2w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.23.135 with SMTP id ia7mr11638119pad.5.1393022717636; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:45:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.57.70 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:45:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5576.1393009497@sss.pgh.pa.us> <19686.1393020721@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:45:17 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Lack of index usage when doing array casts From: Peter Geoghegan To: Alexey Klyukin Cc: Tom Lane , pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Alexey Klyukin wrote: > Hopefully I'll be able to give it a spin next week and will let you know > whether the patch improved the execution plans in our environment. 9.3.3 is out this week; you'll have to wait a few months for this if you're using standard packages, I'm afraid. -- Regards, Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance