MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAFj8pRCDWjgo=yLEK-jRDe5VwuNSQSmMqPPmysQf9nHA8gifnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRA2jbXRTGgM1co8gLCNttgaH8miRUSSauMJKWgousDsDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRA6nJRg8oq5k_Cdk5oH5_FjtViG8XLmHKrkqOuiMT_CKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBWMLP3Vyr8z+19eaiJKQoVtBfmDhNJFKXDX6uFzd4vBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <c7eee33c5051f973ab256ee7202c15771c33f47d.camel@cybertec.at>
 <afb4e296d7ce57986f23bcfdee39b259b8f85f56.camel@cybertec.at>
 <CAFj8pRAjU-X6rEE9=1++PdtXOPc2uo=yu-tcFXByi-kN3B_7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRC+hPCc2X88xC=pTJoqmVPApDsageZOMyqaxi5788WxHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRDJ9cq00VYSHxs6LsoHNWjhYXyWWBtV6UgeWwhs0AHa9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBPXTcw_3fpKtgVthV2+9rZGhxitZ40DnAwCrK601TZZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ndtfl4tsnpkb7m7hwvnmlpsascpgd3a7xvjmjhtxffsbrgygtm@4du6zsmnnwq5>
In-Reply-To: <ndtfl4tsnpkb7m7hwvnmlpsascpgd3a7xvjmjhtxffsbrgygtm@4du6zsmnnwq5>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 17:19:09 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t=2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq=DdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
	DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000064af3b0626915a64"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t%3D2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq%3DDdQ%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--00000000000064af3b0626915a64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odes=C3=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.co=
m>
napsal:

> Hi folks,
>
> Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention
> how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly,
> there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> thread?
>

This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll try
to reply in the thread where I got a question.

Regards

Pavel

--00000000000064af3b0626915a64
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">ne 10. 11. 2024 v=C2=A016:24 odes=C3=
=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:9erthalion6@gmail.com">9erthal=
ion6@gmail.com</a>&gt; napsal:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pad=
ding-left:1ex">Hi folks,<br>
<br>
Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention<br=
>
how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly,<br=
>
there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent<br>
patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the<br>
main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn&#39;t even<br>
mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one<br>
thread?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This is probably my error. I do=
n&#39;t try to organize threads, just I&#39;ll try to reply in the thread w=
here I got a question.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div=
><div>Pavel<br></div><div>=C2=A0<br></div></div></div>

--00000000000064af3b0626915a64--