MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAFj8pRA6nJRg8oq5k_Cdk5oH5_FjtViG8XLmHKrkqOuiMT_CKQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBWMLP3Vyr8z+19eaiJKQoVtBfmDhNJFKXDX6uFzd4vBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <c7eee33c5051f973ab256ee7202c15771c33f47d.camel@cybertec.at>
 <afb4e296d7ce57986f23bcfdee39b259b8f85f56.camel@cybertec.at>
 <CAFj8pRAjU-X6rEE9=1++PdtXOPc2uo=yu-tcFXByi-kN3B_7Vw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRC+hPCc2X88xC=pTJoqmVPApDsageZOMyqaxi5788WxHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRDJ9cq00VYSHxs6LsoHNWjhYXyWWBtV6UgeWwhs0AHa9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRBPXTcw_3fpKtgVthV2+9rZGhxitZ40DnAwCrK601TZZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ndtfl4tsnpkb7m7hwvnmlpsascpgd3a7xvjmjhtxffsbrgygtm@4du6zsmnnwq5>
 <CAFj8pRAu4XvNCGu1751t=2YEqLqTjDA3FavMExm2S0KYQq=DdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje>
In-Reply-To: <ssk7uqvu7rirq4vl4ns7vvr5efvgqwpuonu3qpfl6tem7ypifw@jchzp34fhqje>
From: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 19:04:34 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAFj8pRBHrwi6M=QtB_DXjh++r6rEf1HPo1fRM0jN2PJ-CyG0YA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
	DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000596e8a062692d365"
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRBHrwi6M%3DQtB_DXjh%2B%2Br6rEf1HPo1fRM0jN2PJ-CyG0YA%40mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

--000000000000596e8a062692d365
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

ne 10. 11. 2024 v 18:41 odes=C3=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.co=
m>
napsal:

> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odes=C3=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmai=
l.com>
> > napsal:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to
> mention
> > > how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand
> correctly,
> > > there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent
> > > patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the
> > > main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even
> > > mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one
> > > thread?
> > >
> >
> > This is probably my error. I don't try to organize threads, just I'll t=
ry
> > to reply in the thread where I got a question.
>
> It's fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to
> look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from
> the other one, plus some improvements, right?
>

I don't remember any change that can be visible for users in this thread.
Laurens does very precious code review (thank you again) - there are bigger
changes in comments, and less changes in code - some parts of code are
moved between patches, some lines were redundant and removed, some lines
were artefacts of some git work and were cleaned. Some redundant tests were
removed. There is no new code.

Regards

Pavel

--000000000000596e8a062692d365
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">ne 10. 11. 2024 v=C2=A018:41 odes=C3=
=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:9erthalion6@gmail.com">9erthal=
ion6@gmail.com</a>&gt; napsal:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" s=
tyle=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);pad=
ding-left:1ex">&gt; On Sun, Nov 10, 2024 at 05:19:09PM GMT, Pavel Stehule w=
rote:<br>
&gt; ne 10. 11. 2024 v 16:24 odes=C3=ADlatel Dmitry Dolgov &lt;<a href=3D"m=
ailto:9erthalion6@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">9erthalion6@gmail.com</a>&gt=
;<br>
&gt; napsal:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Hi folks,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to =
mention<br>
&gt; &gt; how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand cor=
rectly,<br>
&gt; &gt; there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with rec=
ent<br>
&gt; &gt; patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g.=
 the<br>
&gt; &gt; main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn&#39;=
t even<br>
&gt; &gt; mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in=
 one<br>
&gt; &gt; thread?<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; This is probably my error. I don&#39;t try to organize threads, just I=
&#39;ll try<br>
&gt; to reply in the thread where I got a question.<br>
<br>
It&#39;s fine. I just would appreciate some clarity about which patch to<br=
>
look at. To confirm, the series in this thread contains everything from<br>
the other one, plus some improvements, right?<br></blockquote><div><br></di=
v><div>I don&#39;t remember any change that can be visible for users in thi=
s thread.=C2=A0 Laurens does very precious code review (thank you again) - =
there are bigger changes in comments, and less changes in code - some parts=
 of code are moved between patches, some lines were redundant and removed, =
some lines were artefacts of some git work and were cleaned. Some redundant=
 tests were removed. There is no new code.<br></div><div>=C2=A0</div><div>R=
egards</div><div><br></div><div>Pavel<br></div></div></div>

--000000000000596e8a062692d365--