public inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Claudio Freire <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Ivan Voras <[email protected]>
Cc: postgres performance list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Indexes for hashes
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 01:18:52 -0300
Message-ID: <CAGTBQpbAYMc96HMDWnJPGr+XTKtB_f_ouv3nXxo_yNZEefDFnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGu3fESMbee4ZXDTKwWgN0U7j99rYy3f6vRcjp44Qr88Mp+=TA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF-QHFULmVOdrqwtR7AKRnnx6=GbAW7S6v6f4jACEOVENef7NA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGTBQpY7apkp79d2a+mgz-o0MggLrY-nGaMFZBjvGCuvyAA75A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGu3fESMbee4ZXDTKwWgN0U7j99rYy3f6vRcjp44Qr88Mp+=TA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:09 AM, julyanto SUTANDANG
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This way is doing faster using crc32(data) than hashtext since crc32 is
> hardware accelerated in intel (and others perhaps)
> this way (crc32)  is no way the same as hash, much way faster than others...
>
> Regards,

Sure, but I've had uniformity issues with crc32.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Indexes for hashes
  In-Reply-To: <CAGTBQpbAYMc96HMDWnJPGr+XTKtB_f_ouv3nXxo_yNZEefDFnA@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox