Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5ht8-0008E7-1x for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 23:06:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5ht7-0004n9-63 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 23:06:53 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5hrP-0002s5-Q2 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 23:05:07 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b5hrH-0003JL-94 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 25 May 2016 23:05:06 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v12so1193421obg.0 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:04:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9JHxw6QOSimnacKD2uwqA1D9rssKH62jSzMgnzqt7bc=; b=cdvzFDzG4X8fFyqVSWRM0NDRyvjTcpltzVyZdUs4JQ1tae/FTkwTYip9m+qBcJM8h4 dex6/+5Wtl/37OYQHgSUlZ34WL1wVZ0lOC34iqthJodTIivv+BIP9zwxYKH8N8g/smcH qZjWAyNFnfAGqlb3cMALN0rgcGXhiOLk5nBQuEZNYexwiN1XuhcNlGhaWbioxr6dmTDb qBNHaYMac3B3wKs/d0eR/2CSM/nofauJbtpWl1dJA2T4rSK1FFFppm+7H23hnc8lgff5 LXOlyfAyCODzBbIDreGZb/kz3+bNA/db5EQLnEaH/2QNnnokucAxOWsKB4EB89xgIZF/ wdHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9JHxw6QOSimnacKD2uwqA1D9rssKH62jSzMgnzqt7bc=; b=Pzvw8OV1mdnnWJe1RUbWCSTABM799n/3WIn/9/IYqa6aeO7CQlX9yxZXvvoJoJNGwl /V9jeGfD7M5GO5fz1QVbFeU75XsMHRtf7Q3FVO9Gn+2pyPXuDd59E6ImPxHYV2UK1mPo dJjvW4BqyEg/lU7Wgqf+te4GI/G67Np4hNAdCXDlCvyIiqVlSeJ6tKAFtUTzOFLFodO3 qyE9ua4dgpzcXyVaGMQT8HLYHMxDvwX4IclMJOjsAtPYxP9lgCS3TCkHxSexOSeg3k20 tlo8zaQepBAL9DDffIiQmsB6a8AWK2AcJXBDJL9zzh5HlIRr7NXLSoyI2vTj27KZgV4B b0KQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKySUrk1nR0ZpC3li8/CpDE3HZByrRVBrD0wJaiwwGvaV2h71l2sbbablAyLiDF3wtw9VKx2nI2mM//eQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.4.7 with SMTP id 7mr3956060oie.140.1464217371497; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.244.3 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2016 16:02:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 19:02:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Testing in AWS, EBS From: Rayson Ho To: Tory M Blue Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c0331e4d5ebc0533b2ac6f X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org --001a11c0331e4d5ebc0533b2ac6f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 There are many factors that can affect EBS performance. For example, the type of EBS volume, the instance type, whether EBS-optimized is turned on or not, etc. Without the details, then there is no apples to apples comparsion... Rayson ================================================== Open Grid Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/ http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/GridEngine/GridEngineCloud.html On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Tory M Blue wrote: > > We are starting some testing in AWS, with EC2, EBS backed setups. > > What I found interesting today, was a single EBS 1TB volume, gave me > something like 108MB/s throughput, however a RAID10 (4 250GB EBS > volumes), gave me something like 31MB/s (test after test after test). > > I'm wondering what you folks are using inside of Amazon (not > interested in RDS at the moment). > > Thanks > Tory > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance --001a11c0331e4d5ebc0533b2ac6f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
There are many factors that can affect EBS performance. Fo= r example, the type of EBS volume, the instance type, whether EBS-optimized= is turned on or not, etc.

Without the details, then the= re is no apples to apples comparsion...

Rayson

=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Open Gri= d Scheduler - The Official Open Source Grid Engine
http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/
<= a href=3D"http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/GridEngine/GridEngineCloud.h= tml">http://gridscheduler.sourceforge.net/GridEngine/GridEngineCloud.html



On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Tory M Blue <tmblue@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>= ; We are starting some testing in AWS, with EC2, EBS backed setups.
>=
> What I found interesting today, was a single EBS 1TB volume, gave = me
> something like 108MB/s throughput, however a RAID10 (4 250GB EBS=
> volumes), gave me something like 31MB/s (test after test after tes= t).
>
> I'm wondering what you folks are using inside of Am= azon (not
> interested in RDS at the moment).
>
> Thanks<= br>> Tory
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance = mailing list (pgsql-per= formance@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:<= br>> ht= tp://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
--001a11c0331e4d5ebc0533b2ac6f--