public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
To: patibandlakoshal <[email protected]>
Cc: postgres performance list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Cursor vs Set Operation
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:28:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHyXU0zhQeC+SfinvmjX1vSYdDfcxeukLV8_se7gMWyXM=S_tg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 5:51 PM, patibandlakoshal
<[email protected]> wrote:
> From performance standpoint I thought set operation was better than Cursor.
> But I found Cursor to be more effective than Set operation. Is there a way
> we can force optimizer to use cursor plan. QUERY PLAN
You're going to have to be a little more specific. In particular, I
have no idea what a 'cursor plan' is. What precise operations did you
do?
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Cursor vs Set Operation
In-Reply-To: <CAHyXU0zhQeC+SfinvmjX1vSYdDfcxeukLV8_se7gMWyXM=S_tg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox