public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Merlin Moncure <[email protected]>
To: Charles Nadeau <[email protected]>
Cc: postgres performance list <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:15:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHyXU0zhpFtoOHgC8Fvb92rs038ofc0VBP7aKVnv1=rsLCxazQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADFyZw7aGoD0AaStxdyHByR5Qta=M5wx0v=iptKLhPUp+EOKvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADFyZw7aGoD0AaStxdyHByR5Qta=M5wx0v=iptKLhPUp+EOKvA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Charles Nadeau
<[email protected]> wrote:
> I’m running PostgreSQL 9.6.3 on Ubuntu 16.10 (kernel 4.4.0-85-generic).
> Hardware is:
>
> *2x Intel Xeon E5550
>
> *72GB RAM
>
> *Hardware RAID10 (4 x 146GB SAS 10k) P410i controller with 1GB FBWC (80%
> read/20% write) for Postgresql data only:
>
> The problem I have is very poor read. When I benchmark my array with fio I
> get random reads of about 200MB/s and 1100IOPS and sequential reads of about
> 286MB/s and 21000IPS. But when I watch my queries using pg_activity, I get
> at best 4MB/s. Also using dstat I can see that iowait time is at about 25%.
> This problem is not query-dependent.

Stop right there.     1100 iops * 8kb = ~8mb/sec raw which might
reasonably translate to 4mb/sec to the client. 200mb/sec random
read/sec on spinning media is simply not plausible; your benchmark is
lying to you.   Random reads on spinning media are absolutely going to
be storage bound.

merlin


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
  In-Reply-To: <CAHyXU0zhpFtoOHgC8Fvb92rs038ofc0VBP7aKVnv1=rsLCxazQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox