Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1agenL-000098-2Z for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:45:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1agenK-0002NW-J2 for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:45:22 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1agenJ-0002L9-8H for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:45:21 +0000 Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1agenA-0000xA-Un for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 20:45:20 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m7so96020054obh.3 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:45:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GOiqgLSAs49dmariMrSKgvAVCseJt7NPJPnHuEb1Ap8=; b=ryiuQHaYukUXpSyz2wWzsFznPeeCXsl8VwWSzzpgeNKErgQkuaiWkkn0lMlYzMuFS7 0IuPqjtZ34YGcsuCLdQBPRZWpPwhQqZ0j+ru3sEZvwzzxh7dM7UNDp0HN0m0lLczQzKB onyk5qKCX8HUlBtsTEXcGVwxYrIEs0Mu06AW0rtjHJ+6Vm0+1Ecz37shj7zS0rfz0kyt h/RwF7ijc7hQu4iZwt62cUFw9OC5dVHeaWyGVPS41DZ4lJATytOGNP7GtfxAItu1i3VR dCgirXj/KDQh3W7frHp2EeA6wTARkwMd/LQHLgqmu0kEkMTHU91V8IqLAErSdM1XYZ+r GQpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=GOiqgLSAs49dmariMrSKgvAVCseJt7NPJPnHuEb1Ap8=; b=apk8jFDeAOkH/bEwZcaI3+4M8omcbeLzjq0iYnGghdiRY56vB4otoc+WPPYmC+Wpzq aTB+JHiehA1mUtnWbugNojqc/yB3MOhxdmQDT6cv+tNPNEW83UNC3Oh4kPuMq/bWModi jslY4gDq5Flfwlt4eUQOFqVfqa3eHcHmUgOL/kZKok7ftsXcgCW8+hXuE9y5LYbKxN4E 83NzsJnNx4FBa7+1uPAE4tT2YpWdksBSNBp3hkRhcHI2xVe8/seJEFWl1ErN621ku+6X VXXGatmObsi1pw6mO6z/3sOLmNpdijeQZJOXhfPhKRT90XTeGImPf/o/6mYXw0o/4C31 dWsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLo+95TecpFRrAw7UKLUcOl59rRwOR+f6Hr9QyeKc64FBPt91FySP7IIAtj69xkiUrzLbg/S7SHMUFN1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.81.197 with SMTP id c5mr7409298oby.7.1458247511039; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.141.9 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:45:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Disk Benchmarking Question From: Dave Stibrany To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b2e4d58e3e7ae052e44b406 X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org --047d7b2e4d58e3e7ae052e44b406 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm pretty new to benchmarking hard disks and I'm looking for some advice on interpreting the results of some basic tests. The server is: - Dell PowerEdge R430 - 1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.4GHz - 32 GB RAM - 4 x 600GB 10k SAS Seagate ST600MM0088 in RAID 10 - PERC H730P Raid Controller with 2GB cache in write back mode. The OS is Ubuntu 14.04, I'm using LVM and I have an ext4 volume for /, and an xfs volume for PGDATA. I ran some dd and bonnie++ tests and I'm a bit confused by the numbers. I ran 'bonnie++ -n0 -f' on the root volume. Here's a link to the bonnie test results https://www.dropbox.com/s/pwe2g5ht9fpjl2j/bonnie.today.html?dl=0 The vendor stats say sustained throughput of 215 to 108 MBps, so I guess I'd expect around 400-800 MBps read and 200-400 MBps write. In any case, I'm pretty confused as to why the read and write sequential speeds are almost identical. Does this look wrong? Thanks, Dave --047d7b2e4d58e3e7ae052e44b406 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm pretty new to benchmarking hard disks and I&#= 39;m looking for some advice on interpreting the results of some basic test= s.

The server is:
- Dell PowerEdge R= 430
- 1 x Intel Xeon E5-2620 2.4GHz
- 32 GB RAM
- 4 x 600GB 10k SAS Seagate ST600MM0088 in RAID 10
- PERC H730= P Raid Controller with 2GB cache in write back mode.

The OS is Ubuntu 14.04, I'm using LVM and I have an ext4 volume for = /, and an xfs volume for PGDATA.

I ran some dd and= bonnie++ tests and I'm a bit confused by the numbers. I ran 'bonni= e++ -n0 -f' on the root volume.

Here's a l= ink to the bonnie test results

The vendo= r stats say sustained throughput of 215 to 108 MBps, so I guess I'd exp= ect around 400-800 MBps read and 200-400 MBps write. In any case, I'm p= retty confused as to why the read and write sequential speeds are almost id= entical. Does this look wrong?

Thanks,
<= br>
Dave



--047d7b2e4d58e3e7ae052e44b406--