public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Scott Marlowe <[email protected]>
To: Dave Stibrany <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Disk Benchmarking Question
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 04:32:13 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOR=d=33jpYDj8vVKE_9r4gyfF76VH0H0vTOcf_GomR4aj_jyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOR=d=0=rSYFqjH0fKofpquzm1L8t3oaQnDZ2fGj4YJmN0mYdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAK17Jmku_RsBRHYKEVbT5KY9Cg1O4J6Zgpk4zYTXq2UQ1=LeMA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOR=d=0=rSYFqjH0fKofpquzm1L8t3oaQnDZ2fGj4YJmN0mYdg@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Scott Marlowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> Given the size of your bonnie test set and the fact that you're using
> RAID-10, the cache should make little or no difference. The RAID
> controller may or may not interleave reads between all four drives.
> Some do, some don't. It looks to me like yours doesn't. I.e. when
> reading it's not reading all 4 disks at once, but just 2, 1 from each
> pair.
Point of clarification. It may be that if two processes are reading
the data set at once you'd get a sustained individual throughput that
matches what a single read can get.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Disk Benchmarking Question
In-Reply-To: <CAOR=d=33jpYDj8vVKE_9r4gyfF76VH0H0vTOcf_GomR4aj_jyA@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox