public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Marcin Barczynski <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Slow vacuum of GIST indexes, because of random reads on PostgreSQL 9.6
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 13:57:25 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOhG4wem20oFCyZhGW-WyqJcno45z2trPnvsDrDUcPbOytFycg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>
I am using a GIST index on timestamp range, because it supports 'contains'
operator ('@>'). Unfortunately, in large scale (billions of rows, index
size: almost 800 GB) vacuuming the index takes an order of magnitude longer
than btrees (days/weeks instead of hours).
According to the code, during vacuum gist index is traversed in a logical
order which translates into random disk acceses (function gistbulkdelete in
gistvacuum.c). Btree indexes are vacuummed in physical order (function
btvacuumscan in nbtree.c).
As a workaround, I'm planning to replace all uses of 'contains' with the
following function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION tstzrange_contains(
range tstzrange,
ts timestamptz)
RETURNS bool AS
$$
SELECT (ts >= lower(range) AND (lower_inc(range) OR ts > lower(range)))
AND (ts <= upper(range) AND (upper_inc(range) OR ts < upper(range)))
$$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
and create btree indexes on lower and upper bound:
CREATE INDEX my_table_time_range_lower_idx ON my_table
(lower(time_range));
CREATE INDEX my_table_time_range_upper_idx ON my_table
(upper(time_range));
Is it the best approach?
--
Best regards,
Marcin Barczynski
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Slow vacuum of GIST indexes, because of random reads on PostgreSQL 9.6
In-Reply-To: <CAOhG4wem20oFCyZhGW-WyqJcno45z2trPnvsDrDUcPbOytFycg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox