Received: from localhost (maia-1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5B29FA3E5 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:44:16 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94878-01 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:44:12 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from westnet.com (westnet.com [216.187.52.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58FA9FA303 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:44:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from westnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l5NJi4QL003536; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:44:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (gsmith@localhost) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.13.2/Submit) with ESMTP id l5NJi4vB003532; Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:44:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: westnet.com: gsmith owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:44:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Smith X-X-Sender: gsmith@westnet.com To: Sabin Coanda cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Configuration Tool for Dummies - feedback adjustable control In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200706/556 X-Sequence-Number: 25589 On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Sabin Coanda wrote: > Instead of (or in addition to) configure dozens of settings, what do you > say about a feedback adjustable control based on the existing system > statistics and parsing logs Take a look at the archive of this list for the end of April/Early May. There's a thread there named "Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning" that addressed this subject in length I think you'll find interesting reading. I personally feel there's much more long-term potential for a tool that inspects the database, but the needs of something looking for getting good starting configuration file (before there necessarily is even a populated database) is different enough that it may justify building two different tools. I would suggest you or anything else building the starter configuration tool not stray from the path of getting the most important variables set to reasonable values. Trying to satisfy every possible user is the path that leads to a design so complicated that it's unlikely you'll ever get a finished build done at all. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD