Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6749F2E006D for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:09:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14313-03 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:09:35 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from westnet.com (westnet.com [216.187.52.2]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C032E003D for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:09:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from westnet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m3Q09eaZ002002 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:09:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (gsmith@localhost) by westnet.com (8.14.0/8.13.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m3Q09edu001999 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:09:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: westnet.com: gsmith owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:09:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Greg Smith X-X-Sender: gsmith@westnet.com To: pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Sun Talks about MySQL In-Reply-To: <20080425152053.GE19447@crankycanuck.ca> Message-ID: References: <480F8C2D.6010806@emproshunts.com> <4811D1DD.9030401@otg-nc.com> <20080425130105.GA19447@crankycanuck.ca> <36e682920804250741p33d621f3gf35e6bdebe2e0531@mail.gmail.com> <20080425152053.GE19447@crankycanuck.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/140 X-Sequence-Number: 13866 On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Therefore the claim that the sudden addition of 100 developers who know > about databases to the MySQL "stable" will result in sudden increases in > innovation is nonsense. Adding a bunch of new developers to a project involving a code base they are unfamiliar with will inevitably reduce short-term reliability. But you can't pay attention to anything said by someone who claims any piece of software has zero bugs anyway; they've clearly lost all touch with reality and are saying nonsense. Zack at MySQL might as well have said that they have magical code fairies who have fixed 5.1 and will continue to be on board for future releases. I think it shows how much MySQL has been feeling the pain from the truly shoddy 5.0 release and its associated quality control issues that they are publicizing the incredible number of bug fixes they had to do, and flat out admitting they weren't happy with it. An interesting data point is they advertise a 10-15% gain in DBT2 results. I've started thinking about a 2008 update to my "PostgreSQL vs. MySQL" paper that covers PG 8.3 and MySQL 5.1. I'd love to have a similar comparision using that same benchmark of PG8.2->PG8.3. I recall Heikki was doing lots of tests with DBT2 for EnterpriseDB comparing those two releases like that; anybody know of a good summary I could utilize there? I thought that was one of the benchmarks that got a 20-30% speedup on going to 8.3 because it really took advantage of HOT in particular. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD