Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvdp-0005AO-Ul for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:13:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvdp-0005Kr-4p for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:13:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvdj-0005AL-OT for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:13:08 +0000 Received: from post.visena.com ([46.226.10.50]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvde-0004DD-Mf for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:13:04 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=visena.com; s=20141101.wh; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject:Message-ID:To:From:Date; bh=LjJd8mMByraWA2wBOrhoCBLGvfkM7iI1xKKP3fKc/Z0=; b=PzN0ahSSjGiNr6oKNw/fmWHjT8DhCb7uyyVhzqTfXznQtpG8/8Rv+XcM0m2LlBjKhSmR9cfJEXHJQP4ajNKjBViEVEtxE79QHgkFTRAE4ur30ovsqYE6Cq1fBC1CwnQ4q6E6LHG4f2REyRmJzaIgWxX5GhqbUXDvs4C8ikS/lYE=; Received: from [10.0.1.10] (helo=tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com) by post.visena.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvdX-0001py-UX for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:12:58 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com) by tc7-visena.wh.internal.visena.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YKvdX-00066d-Ev for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:12:55 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:12:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Joseph Krogh To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Message-ID: Subject: Poor performance when deleting from entity-attribute-value type master-table MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Visena Mail 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT X-Spam-Score: -0.3 X-Spam-Report: SpamAssasin (score=-0.3, required 5.0 ALL_TRUSTED=-1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=0.726, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001) X-Pg-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_266_1025525056.1423516375380" List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-performance Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org ------=_Part_265_208755505.1423516375380 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_266_1025525056.1423516375380" ------=_Part_266_1025525056.1423516375380 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_267_1381951653.1423516375392" ------=_Part_267_1381951653.1423516375392 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all. =C2=A0 Using PG-9.4.0 I'm seeing this trying to delete from an=20 "entity"-master table: =C2=A0 *# explain analyze=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 de= lete from onp_crm_entity=20 where entity_id IN (select tmp.delivery_id from temp_delete_delivery_id tmp= ); =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 QUERY=20 PLAN=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------------ =C2=A0Delete on onp_crm_entity=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.43..5673.40 rows=3D1770 wid= th=3D12) (actual=20 time=3D7.370..7.370 rows=3D0 loops=3D1) =C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Nested Loop=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.43..5673.40 rows=3D1770 = width=3D12) (actual=20 time=3D0.050..1.374 rows=3D108 loops=3D1) =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Seq Scan on temp= _delete_delivery_id tmp=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.00..27.70=20 rows=3D1770 width=3D14) (actual time=3D0.014..0.080 rows=3D108 loops=3D1) =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Index Scan using= onp_crm_entity_pkey on onp_crm_entity=C2=A0=20 (cost=3D0.43..3.18 rows=3D1 width=3D14) (actual time=3D0.010..0.011 rows=3D= 1 loops=3D108) =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0 Index Cond: (entity_id =3D tmp.delivery_id) =C2=A0Planning time: 0.314 ms =C2=A0Trigger for constraint onp_crm_activity_entity_id_fkey: time=3D4.141= calls=3D108=20 =C2=A0Trigger for constraint ... =C2=A0Trigger for constraint ... =C2=A0Tri= gger for constraint=20 ... =C2=A0 =C2=A0 I have lots of tables referencing onp_crm_entity(entity_i= d) so I expect=20 the poor performance of deleting from it is caused by all the triggers firi= ng=20 to check FKI-constraints. =C2=A0 Are there any ways around this or do peopl= e simply=20 avoid having FKs in schemas like this? =C2=A0 Thanks. =C2=A0 -- Andreas Jos= eph Krogh CTO=20 / Partner - Visena AS Mobile: +47 909 56 963 andreas@visena.com=20 www.visena.com =20 ------=_Part_267_1381951653.1423516375392 Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all.
=C2=A0
Using PG-9.4.0 I'm seeing this trying to delete from an "entity&q= uot;-master table:
=C2=A0
*# explain analyze=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 delete from onp_crm_entity = where entity_id IN (select tmp.delivery_id from temp_delete_delivery_id tmp= );
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 QUERY PLAN=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------------------ =C2=A0Delete on onp_crm_entity=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.43..5673.40 rows=3D1770 widt= h=3D12) (actual time=3D7.370..7.370 rows=3D0 loops=3D1)
=C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Nested Loop=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.43..5673.40 rows=3D177= 0 width=3D12) (actual time=3D0.050..1.374 rows=3D108 loops=3D1)
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Seq Scan on te= mp_delete_delivery_id tmp=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.00..27.70 rows=3D1770 width=3D14)= (actual time=3D0.014..0.080 rows=3D108 loops=3D1)
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ->=C2=A0 Index Scan usi= ng onp_crm_entity_pkey on onp_crm_entity=C2=A0 (cost=3D0.43..3.18 rows=3D1 = width=3D14) (actual time=3D0.010..0.011 rows=3D1 loops=3D108)
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 Index Cond: (entity_id =3D tmp.delivery_id)
=C2=A0Planning time: 0.314 ms
=C2=A0Trigger for constraint onp_crm_activity_entity_id_fkey: time=3D4.141 = calls=3D108
=C2=A0Trigger for constraint ...
=C2=A0Trigger for constraint ...
=C2=A0Trigger for constraint ...
=C2=A0
=C2=A0
I have lots of tables referencing onp_crm_entity(entity_id) so I expec= t the poor performance of deleting from it is caused by all the triggers fi= ring to check FKI-constraints.
=C2=A0
Are there any ways around this or do people simply avoid having FKs in= schemas like this?
=C2=A0
Thanks.
=C2=A0
--
Andrea= s Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner<= /span> - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 90= 9 56 963
=3D""
------=_Part_267_1381951653.1423516375392-- ------=_Part_266_1025525056.1423516375380 Content-Type: image/png Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline Content-ID: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAIUAAAAYCAYAAADUIj6hAAAABHNCSVQICAgIfAhkiAAABzBJREFU aEPtmNFxHDcMhmVP3i1VECpvnjzkVIHWFfhcgVcVRKrAUgWRK/C6Al8H3lTgy0PGbzFdQc4VJP/H ADs43q6kROeJNbOYgQACIAgCWJKng4MZ5gxUGXh0U0b+SIuF9G+EWXj2Q15vbrE/NPtk9uub7Gfd t5mBx1NhqSEo8HshjbEUtlO2yIM9tsx5dZP9rPt2MzDZFAqZE4LGcFjdsg3saQaHt7fY70X949On aS+OZidDBkavD33157L4xaw2os+Mp/DAC10l2XhOCeStj0W5ajrJL8WfCi80Xgf9vVlrhg9yRONe /f7xI2vNsIcM7JwU9o6oGyJrLT8JOA1aX9sKP4wl94bAniukEbo/n7YPmuTETzIab4Y9ZWCrKexd 8M58lxPCvvD6aihfvexbEQoPYO8NQRO0JnddGO6FJYaVsBde7cXj7KRk4LsqDxQzCYeGsJNgaXZe +JXkyGgWINq3Gp+bHNILz+wEYs5qH1eJrouNrpDXtk4O6x1IvtD40GWyJYYdkF0jIbYZlN16xygI gl9smbMDsmFdfAKb23xGB8H/mv3tOJfArs1kukk79DEPdQ5u0g1vCvvqKXIW8mZYW+F3Tg4r8HvZ kQCCLydK8EFMQCe5N8RgL9mRG0SqQFuNvdE6beSs0qPDBuCdg0+gvClso8SbTO4ki7mQzQqBrcMH QPwReg2wW8umEe/+L8T/LEzBGF9nXjzZ46s+ITHvhegW8LL39xm6App7KYL/GE+vcYnFbJiP/0aY hdiCnRC7jaj7eiK2ETInC5PRF6LYkSN0+HabF75WuT6syCyI0YkVGGMvUC33AmfZTDUEj8u6IVhu EhRUJ2U2g6UlugyNb03Hl9obHwlxJbcRzcYjO4QPjVfGFTQav4vrmp7cpMp2qbHnBxWJbisbho2Q XI6C1sIHDUFhH4Hij4UbIev66eANeiwbkA+LBsO36zAHzoXU7AhbqLAXEiOYTXcSdO8VS9L4wN8U BIYhBd6oSUgYMijOkecRuTdQa/YiBXhbXFcnCnI2SrfeBG9NydrLYMhGHa5qB9pQIxlzAE6Okjzx JO5afGe6kmhBicWKQNKuTZ5EW+MjQY8v/9rQ0bhJSJyNGUe/JH1t8h1iMbdSPAvxHYin6YmN9YBX QmTYZZNh14vHhhhal5vtcIrJjmvszPRJdExH3MWHvykoBEc9CoCGWJisOLOGoCORs1FvIMbYA8z3 kwM59oemy6LlWrLxFLmWgiQAfEGd8S+NssbK+EhyGLxUkhhiy717waBqHOJYSEacwBejkFNhjJNj v/gANOdQxPfciP/JVBCK2cOIcg3RRJ+CPrLPNVhhN6F38VKMF3XLlIJrjU5C8gMFxvKDvOcPc4rV NjCn7KM0BV+161V8viSCuJZ8SITGJGEh7IUUlxOFMYUH1kJOCN4Wh+I5pqCuK01k40kSNtnKiKIl UfxAgW5sU5JlS05rtt5YFJF1SWoqHv6BRgQcA4/bdb9WRjmMk3jyUMAbIoyJq9e4cVmgzKt9j5gN J/aYDhk+hhjExwaPcz5PObA5Zd9bvz5UzCTZuZDidu5AchpiKSwPR+TV1bCWqBQ9nCjJ5neivC82 Nr4LeS2j1gw5LUqwBuhGQQU5UwHeSslXkwIynz2U2A2yKDgG7OffwLA3TpGRpk0Tzpj3ZEJXi/GR a6GN0e0NtppChePdcAz1FTS+FN8Kpxoiykk+J8fC5tenjbu9kSqpHLu9jBrhUuhNwVGbpyZrzrl0 HPVD8SXj5EOOD/eDC64VjvYBZLuUbIVAfBN1t/C/SU+cAGtdGo+fVnzycUX5wmn6eCKPmWYJG2E/ ppTsuRCbvUD9fwquksG5GqLVKhzDQ3GrEyLKSXhsiK3T5j9EyxffCFOYi2wUlPyFFDQAhehESDjQ GoX0ho0oj8RPou6TxHJdcT0NTcWkO0AnG7+uXsnHqcas/72wvWF+mSf7N/Watp9kTXoluzeS0fB9 9CcZ/hvhSZTfh99pispZOXL9KrGrARkNUMu9ITbScZWs7xOYNt9pwxSZtYDsX/GE3xTkrXgwAsXm fud08FiTeC+m2/o7ppo+PTS/NBK5ARpDG5YHr++DpmVfreYdiX8mnp+DzPEG9WbqJON0JBenZofs sxBA1gj5NXGvfJu/Qh7HwQh/VDUEyUxCit5hH94QfKkEdu+GwK8BX0hvCF+D67xhjmXQCXMwJCZ+ olK0A1EKRCE4snsh42w8Mv/Zhxw9iD7Cjo7CyQC/KyF6oBfShL4PYgG+CHsYKyZxvxZSZBAgjhIz YDz+AbfD37GtbaoSKzgGt+lKfI/GZtay6vG4VXTpPsh+IcQhOk9I7WYeP5AM3HZ9+DaSGIp9HIuu huC4pCGGx+YD2fcc5tfIAA0h/Et4/jX8zz4fWAasIf4UbR9Y6HO4d8jAnd4U0Y8ageuCB+c+H5R3 CHU2mTMwZ+B/y8DfSMBLLOYXVuEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= ------=_Part_266_1025525056.1423516375380-- ------=_Part_265_208755505.1423516375380--