Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXbgd-0005YN-6t for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:04:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXbgb-0006pI-Rk for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:04:13 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXbga-0006pA-Qk for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:04:12 +0000 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mXbgW-0006hm-Qs for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2021 04:04:11 +0000 Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id j13so18010368qtq.6 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:04:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJtKaaMY5qzNszEgZIhj8TlV9XVV+cEMd5OYxOfUQS8=; b=qendz7zxolw03V+fRmAyOIqWu/aIQfYfVGp8mruTo2gjYceryemxVOtu/lZgiDN59F nUGY8/RAsGO9QiRdeSnbLfYINUTBxosSvHvt/yc9juMvDJ7P2B3v4oXMHfmVnendBN2y A6vkTGH4vMzbVlvBc+/rdrJKNwTKgjLS18qGsLCXzy3bfbvRjO7nmuaxx7G45D4YQI0V G7DwZ7xbL+CrPrV4Qx4x7nqjemX7FrgKYhwt2uTw0naHZUf3l9FYD1cU6UWnwDX5sXKB ZyrOWa0D8vPZ1iT40XBnJmAxV2ylDK9ud/nMud4TetmlyKJYLECRhU93a6g39SVFq9DH QIQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xJtKaaMY5qzNszEgZIhj8TlV9XVV+cEMd5OYxOfUQS8=; b=YJWq1sWSnt7WtKRSQx0ZUR4ZT7DBhBYclG+yOhHuKFhdLaVXQa/jjBzQsQpiMc0kuy G4/koq+bcg1UDZ2SAs0jRt8/pxIN3cskiOETZNr3HF4/hlHQU2oQ0okSPjnhMgrv6fjH 9+MAxuyv3QQGC73KKgMA/It6UtTVUNIRehWxGoDTE75uW4nFxnl0RhuCid2L/2oh7DYp XcymhyufjfoWstH7LNg1eugE10fBHRd6ZDu8zFSna7pALwX9Nn18nHLFWeS3Ru9owXVu HVIrh4hjJo/bCBeqxfU3b3aOkpD+pv8BRlipv4ch4Zr/3GTa7uI/6fzrOXQaif2vv77d cRbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530C7OEnPBg7TAQ/JxofKEAkrNBH/Y2712oDt0Cz5TkMAHZ5ZNKM +gNVAcoKcpqEXPavaVUiIxzWSCVbkig3Dg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvqvZti15egCjQGXSZWenkqZHcsjbAz+0lBTgXxxNUZQPLle29WZRGN/DcS1SNYMT3y8vxeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:144b:: with SMTP id v11mr17503728qtx.320.1633406647238; Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:04:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-72-79-19-93.nwrknj.east.verizon.net. [72.79.19.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m68sm8921902qkb.105.2021.10.04.21.04.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:04:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 00:04:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0 Subject: Re: Better, consistent instrumentation for postgreSQL using a similar API as Oracle Content-Language: en-US To: Peter Geoghegan Cc: pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org References: <9cecae326e8d73ff9e01c000d738b6a52dc76076.camel@cybertec.at> From: Mladen Gogala In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk On 10/4/21 23:08, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > n all sincerity: Chill out. I don't think that this is worth getting > into an argument over. I think that there is a good chance that you'd > have had a much better experience if the conversation had been in > person. Text has a way of losing a lot of important nuance. > > I have personally met and enjoyed talking to quite a few people that > personally worked on Oracle, in various capacities -- the world of > database internals experts is not huge. I find Tanel Poder very > interesting, too -- never met the man, but we follow each other on > Twitter. Oracle is a system that has some interesting properties in > general (not just as a counterpoint to PostgreSQL), and I definitely > respect it. Same with SQL Server. > > There are lots of smart and accomplished people in the world, > including Jeff. I think that it's worth understanding these > differences in perspective. There is likely to be merit in all of the > specific points made by both Laurenze and Jeff. They may not be > irreconcilable, or anything like it. What angered me was the presumptuous tone of voice directed to an Oracle legend. I have probably talked to many more Oracle people than you, including Tanel, whom I have met personally. I am not on Twitter, unfortunately I am older than 20. Before you ask, I am not on Instagram, Facebook or Tiktok. I am not on OnlyFans either. I have never understood the need to share one's every thought in real time. Being rather private person has probably stymied my career of an internet influencer. I'll never rival Kim Kardashian. As for Jeff Holt, I believe that a person of his stature needs to be taken seriously and not lectured "how are things done in Postgres community". I  am rather confused by the thinly veiled hostility toward Oracle. In my opinion, Postgres community should be rather welcoming to Oracle people like Frits Hoogland, Frank Pachot or Jeff Holt. After all, we are using Postgres and telling us "you can't have what you used to get from Oracle" is not either encouraging or smart. If you want consulting jobs in big banks and for a decent money, you might just take Oracle people seriously. Have you ever wondered why Oracle has so many customers despite the fact that it's so freakishly expensive? -- Mladen Gogala Database Consultant Tel: (347) 321-1217 https://dbwhisperer.wordpress.com