Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:06:59 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>,
	Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>,
	Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
	jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>,
	Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
	Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
	DUVAL REMI <REMI.DUVAL@cheops.fr>,
	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Message-ID: <aCzu84eWXnXPvFmf@momjian.us>
References: 
 <CAFj8pRArtw+Qqzk+Zf2NxjgO=paCBdc54eEma+MsVwtx3j7Atg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRAK_8ym1J=SAdin-vtL0PAachXgjWgU3QrhzinRdBX2sw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRAx-Gb9Ux825cxGNm38qQUOrij1GY6erPRaQ=cpqfiX7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFj8pRCEjG005L=1vGbir-odYdcYxByOAeFVJ_K9eRcRF=MbNQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <aCyYHXhAjXOUPvLO@momjian.us>
 <CAB-JLwY2-Hm_SYbj2td_VKuU8awCwgDr-sOtjHRE2C-Sgg_pFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <aCywNzDx2J3jrY1-@momjian.us>
 <41D2EE98-224D-4B43-9F8B-127525A99CD7@yesql.se>
 <aCzl0SQYGTBJfdtY@momjian.us>
 <138d50cd8d9617469922eb0017956a3610089064.camel@cybertec.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <138d50cd8d9617469922eb0017956a3610089064.camel@cybertec.at>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/aCzu84eWXnXPvFmf%40momjian.us>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to repeatedly
> > post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc
> > driver.  I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting
> > patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have
> > decided to reject the patch in in its current form.  I think we might
> > accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that
> > direction.
> > 
> > Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress
> > these emails on my end.
> 
> In my opinion, this patch set is adding something that would be valuable to
> have in core.
> 
> If no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about the
> insistence of the author.

Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
the patch set?  If we officially reject it, the patch author would no
longer post it?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EDB                                      https://enterprisedb.com

  Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.