X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA0F9DCA1A for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:05:45 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 70840-03 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:05:46 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A949DC800 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 05:05:43 -0400 (AST) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id x7so1161437nzc for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:05:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=aN6E5ZlqVXw2TIKK+AUZ62lPwMRPjdHik79sR7VXyKWePqPfZi0kvbNMrtCpFtNrL8gkU49f78rMbzKr8pW4wZNyd8n091rFkpqGzMN1QRwR07nWmjZZPD9rw8KwcGN+PD0a9AdTghdkZ+2p7wukB8fMwG+s1CEESlXBdingbMg= Received: by 10.65.20.17 with SMTP id x17mr2411861qbi; Mon, 06 Mar 2006 01:05:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.216.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:05:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:05:45 +0100 From: "Claus Guttesen" To: "Postgresql Performance" Subject: t1000/t2000 sun-servers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001] X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/30 X-Sequence-Number: 17467 Hi. Has anybody tried the new Sun "cool-thread" servers t1000/t2000 from Sun? I'd love to see benchmarks with Solaris 10 and pg 8.1. regards Claus