Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232539F9267 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:36:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18273-02 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:36:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ABF9F9266 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 07:36:36 -0400 (AST) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1348961nfh for ; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:36:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=CF6QBcnS79d06sBPoazaBQCjAUpxtp55kxH+07cnrCk=; b=O6eTrW3YkYZoqBaBFtF0ohLl7onEBRjGqnYbDqkt1mIgQWqeeCXyfj1Bn26hUGVJHrlLFxf7wHl5ZW/isN68fHVnd8VFobgMzQ/1hIDfplk4THVS3Jagx5jnUy3yhYm289jXGhrn+4VmGciHPCPacQKyW8B5ImZ4U9eoSLMzYJE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EVSFrZDs1PB9TniQrsMn8AeoFqBp+HDM/p0xr1IwnrFTXzpq7osIjYz3zFipz4zyCvcLeiiF/L52tmMjhOmb/mFuT6YNQBqvOr5y8l6cgrlgJtvfBlXtZ+/qViUI9dkyOTUJaAw+JltTRTIvkp/CqbXLgvTl0uNAavQzHcTbls8= Received: by 10.78.205.7 with SMTP id c7mr4775617hug.1194348993495; Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.146.10 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Nov 2007 03:36:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 12:36:33 +0100 From: "Claus Guttesen" To: "Tore Halset" Subject: Re: dell versus hp Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <82607932-FC46-4B73-BF78-2290EE55F7F5@pvv.ntnu.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <82607932-FC46-4B73-BF78-2290EE55F7F5@pvv.ntnu.no> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200711/70 X-Sequence-Number: 27485 > All of our existing servers are from Dell, but I want to look at some > other options as well. We are currently looking at rack boxes with 8 > internal SAS discs. Two mirrored for OS, Two mirrored for WAL and 4 in > raid 10 for the base. > > Here are our current alternatives: > > 1) Dell 2900 (5U) > 8 * 146 GB SAS 15Krpm 3,5" > 8GB ram > Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram. > 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz > > 2) Dell 2950 (2U) > 8 * 146 GB SAS 10Krpm 2,5" (not really selectable, but I think the > webshop is wrong..) > 8GB ram > Perc 5/i. battery backup. 256MB ram. > 2 * 4 Xeon 2,66GHz > > 3) HP ProLiant DL380 G5 (2U) > 8 * 146 GB SAS 10Krpm 2,5" > 8GB ram > P400 raid controller. battery backup. 512MB ram. > 2 * 2 Xeon 3GHz > > All of those alternatives cost ca the same. How much (in numbers) > better are 15K 3,5" than 10K 2,5"? What about the raid controllers? > Any other alternatives in that price-range? When writing is important you want to use 15K rpm disks. I personally use the DL380 and is very satisfied with the hardware and the buildin ciss-controller (with 256 MB cache using 10K rpm disks). How much space do you need? 72 GB is the largest 15K 2.5" sas-disk from HP. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare