Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC902E003A for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 04:51:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86511-01 for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 04:51:08 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2B32E0037 for ; Fri, 2 May 2008 04:51:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so864704fgg.23 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 00:51:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=R5eRuwX9ijLZc1Lk7wkvlDYaJcExVouS2YYCnxCF+mg=; b=FDk6dzAfKKz7emY0ySkar68ZkzFw9XVR3a3dbGP8qAj5w99sxD8k+TxSSxVl+fFh+R/40bX6jNsL7va8QGSnGBYT36j3YlpbOBjMmOmURnwT19W7dz1WgX5Z2hHLcx1vDv9BzvSEi/iM8vHWt9CtMqO0X1gf981x88XzqU17QtI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q4pisnpd/UlziFe4AI/SObONu1ho2D4WR5K+OEfsxIMGVepzXYvqoE+affOw4EawXo1o3KA3YEwI9SVE72SPLqfmjG+4eQVxK5LlrhFKThlWk9MxMS7RUgl9mil7s9NH3ttB3H+aAvfjbPWK2RE99b6oS3x99DMUMkYMzQZXafk= Received: by 10.86.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr4930932fgd.62.1209714669968; Fri, 02 May 2008 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.81.6 with HTTP; Fri, 2 May 2008 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 09:51:09 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" To: "Gauri Kanekar" Subject: Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1 Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <7e4ba9550805020031l6d20b715n8f01cd5e79147dc7@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7e4ba9550805020031l6d20b715n8f01cd5e79147dc7@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200805/11 X-Sequence-Number: 29979 > Can anyone who have started using 8.3.1 list out the pros and cons. I upgraded to 8.3.1 yesterday from 8.3.0. I've used 8.3.0 since it was released and it's working fine. I upgraded from 7.4 (dump/restore) and it was working out of the box. We have somewhat simple sql-queries so there was no need to change/alter these. The largest table has approx. 85 mill. records (image-table). One thing I had newer seen before was that duplicate rows was inserted into our order-table but I don't know whether this is due to changes in the web-app or 8.3.0. Now that I upgraded to 8.3.1 I will wait a few weeks and see if I get the same error before I alter the column and add a unique contraint. So from a 7.4-perspective and fairly simple queries I don't see any issues. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare