DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
	:references;
	b=Mx/1rzpBVPNxAStbsZSmJ6R6gkEr5I8yJkPDP+Mw6wYd++vpAx8TO/CNcetCQue+RK
	qYZfsSsTUS/Dff6mbsTNlU05Ddus5O0UF1U6qnC0ME1xzzEtbdgYmgmSeM7BaUZWeNMk
	ynU+Z0AM4xbrR6lVs6AnU7aayQsVwKIcpgXls=
Message-ID: <b42b73150809090835m6e7781f1uf4ba76fd889447d3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 11:35:16 -0400
From: "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Amber <guxiaobo1982@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL TPC-H test result?
Cc: "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs@commandprompt.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <BLU139-DS28D9D90A25BD2AD8CDEF0CD540@phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <BLU139-DS5AB90A6E11E3F439F0006CD540@phx.gbl>
	<20080909123947.GA59092@commandprompt.com>
	<BLU139-DS28D9D90A25BD2AD8CDEF0CD540@phx.gbl>

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Amber <guxiaobo1982@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, we don't care about the performance results, but we do care about the point that PostgreSQL can't give the correct results of TPC-H queries.

PostgreSQL, at least in terms of the open source databases, is
probably your best bet if you are all concerned about correctness.  Do
not give any credence to a vendor published benchmark unless the test
is published and can be independently verifed.

merlin