X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B61C329CB7 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:48 +0100 (BST) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54172-07 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:58:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33FD329C63 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 11:58:35 +0100 (BST) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so362084rnk for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.14.78 with SMTP id 78mr592173rnn; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.126.6 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Sep 2004 03:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 06:58:32 -0400 From: Mike Rylander Reply-To: Mike Rylander To: Greg Stark Subject: Re: Partitioning Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <87y8jarhoz.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040914223333.GL56059@decibel.org> <60k6uw1cqa.fsf@dev6.int.libertyrms.info> <4147C560.9060702@joeconway.com> <1095282571.25123.181.camel@vulture.corp.neopolitan.com> <87y8jarhoz.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200409/163 X-Sequence-Number: 8291 On 15 Sep 2004 23:55:24 -0400, Greg Stark wrote: > > "J. Andrew Rogers" writes: > > > We do something very similar, also using table inheritance > > I have a suspicion postgres's table inheritance will end up serving as a good > base for a partitioned table feature. Is it currently possible to query which > subtable a record came from though?