Received: from localhost (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834719FA48B for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:46:48 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 97404-05 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:46:44 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.4 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4EC9FA285 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 09:46:43 -0400 (AST) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id k3so815502ugf for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:46:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=niGv/cEWZ+p968g1Zm8zO2NHN3ji7Klfv7BlE8wjzAlS3NKIoc1cQ83H6dvh/dk5ApYxQAajWq0u0/ZGOSYgBaMmMltKHhE9MRl+8ZKLkZuArQaCV4eT/cPVb86PrcpSePl0Hbr4MQVQjQyajSImPJiYDPA6qbY0+E17KZGtvlM= Received: by 10.66.242.5 with SMTP id p5mr10516683ugh.1164548801643; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.223.9 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Nov 2006 05:46:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 10:46:41 -0300 From: "Marcelo Costa" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: When to vacuum a table? In-Reply-To: <20061126131147.GA4089@uio.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10068_32862011.1164548801591" References: <1164540257.7902.0.camel@panoramix> <20061126131147.GA4089@uio.no> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200611/220 X-Sequence-Number: 21990 ------=_Part_10068_32862011.1164548801591 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sorry, realy you are correct. [],s Marcelo Costa. 2006/11/26, Steinar H. Gunderson : > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:43:11AM -0300, Marcelo Costa wrote: > > All its tables constantly manipulated (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) they need > a > > VACUUM > > Just a minor clarification here: INSERT does not create dead rows, only > UPDATE and DELETE do. Thus, if you only insert rows, you do not need to > vacuum (although you probably need to analyze). > > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > -- Marcelo Costa ------=_Part_10068_32862011.1164548801591 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sorry,

realy you are correct.

[],s

Marcelo Costa.

2006/11/26, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:43:11AM -0300, Marcelo Costa wrote:
> All its tables constantly manipulated (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE) they need a
> VACUUM

Just a minor clarification here: INSERT does not create dead rows, only
UPDATE and DELETE do. Thus, if you only insert rows, you do not need to
vacuum (although you probably need to analyze).

/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



--
Marcelo Costa ------=_Part_10068_32862011.1164548801591--