X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957739DD914 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 39383-10 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:45 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1819DD90C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:42 -0400 (AST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i28so968167wra for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UOPkr4rO0UOYD9NQhYeW0MNeOy0r3YWhCAdP0JVSo+HpgqV+Dk9hjj9J9WPjDQEYRUZ9oR4cEkCp7u83lCo4YhUlwS4FziKPUfu2ZF6v4vj6rkIFyKdNyoR5mJ+8nB32Pxnwr8o6vVJpzMOMtdlZQVtrJSSPV5rsoMDwnSAJTsU= Received: by 10.54.83.7 with SMTP id g7mr5845009wrb; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.93.8 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:31:43 -0500 From: Jaime Casanova To: Tomka Gergely Subject: Re: big databases & hospitals Cc: psql performance list In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.087 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087] X-Spam-Score: 0.087 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/191 X-Sequence-Number: 16669 On 1/14/06, Tomka Gergely wrote: > Hi! > > I need to write a few pages about Postgresql, to convince some suits. The= y > have a few millions of records, on a few site, but they want to know the > practical limits of Postgresql. So i need some information about the > biggest (in storage space, in record number, in field number, and maybe > table number) postgresql databases. > here you can see some limits of postgresql: http://www.postgresql.org/about/ -- regards, Jaime Casanova (DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;)