public inbox for [email protected]  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kirkwood <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 11:57:11 +1200
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CADFyZw7aGoD0AaStxdyHByR5Qta=M5wx0v=iptKLhPUp+EOKvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CADFyZw4UanW5TbFajWKWhN9XcW+8gtCXw+kssHo47Wpr1A=zJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<DM5PR07MB28103FD558CB6628CECE07BEDAA90@DM5PR07MB2810.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
	<CADFyZw6JrhsLR_eYOeCjjiQMzz5bepk6AfMRBu0hnaQg+vN-=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
	<CADFyZw5-WzdkACN39-ND9tvBwmvfdEhFaYL3Ds82a3Rwav-neA@mail.gmail.com>
	<[email protected]>
List-Unsubscribe:  <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-performance>

Thinking about this a bit more - if somewhat more blazing performance is 
needed, then this could be achieved via losing the RAID card and 
spinning disks altogether and buying 1 of the NVME or SATA solid state 
products: e.g

- Samsung 960 Pro or Evo 2 TB (approx 1 or 2 GB/s seq scan speeds and 
200K IOPS)

- Intel S3610 or similar 1.2 TB (500 MB/s seq scan and 30K IOPS)


The Samsung needs an M.2 port on the mobo (but most should have 'em - 
and if not PCIe X4 adapter cards are quite cheap). The Intel is a bit 
more expensive compared to the Samsung, and is slower but has a longer 
lifetime. However for your workload the Sammy is probably fine.

regards

Mark

On 15/07/17 11:09, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Ah yes - that seems more sensible (but still slower than I would 
> expect for 5 disks RAID 0).



-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance



reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: [email protected]
  Cc: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Very poor read performance, query independent
  In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox