Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E689937BA30 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:12:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24883-01 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:12:20 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.236]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96CA37B9D9 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 01:12:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1748596rvf.43 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:12:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=C8hcfSTqbRwbTIbCnYRv+tUPMk2wGEWrPb4cIyEv0dI=; b=Ah2DgBfcyyFt4TDsTxHU3wMCvSb2lMP35V0tX0djJpNo2QKgXVqei3ImbAEbRCgDzE YDEBm4y9Pa46wQn+0N/rEPBmvpLw6UEm2tOm27v8nozIv3lHfhAepBm3qIKzxQNHVLeD ogvsCcENSOCR4pHXU7KftJiZaMVSKzj/yWSvI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=e0Td2xc0GUNxKquylwA0af0jbyeUuk7/r7FwRytn7OnpvzIhleVfhE5+zqhEu20ZUn 8R63jyApxwNuo4759L58nk9OZEhMvm82A8BbP2o/al450SZX11dX+1a6MrHXoLatYyLN w5PCTlXLgVlwBdfDOf5d5MBFHrn9aae9uAi/U= Received: by 10.140.126.14 with SMTP id y14mr2173917rvc.96.1222661538972; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.248.12 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2008 21:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:12:18 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "John Huttley" Subject: Re: Slow updates, poor IO Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <48E046C3.2080001@mib-infotech.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <48DBE587.3050406@mib-infotech.co.nz> <48DEB4D4.1020100@mib-infotech.co.nz> <6110.1222612388@sss.pgh.pa.us> <48DFFCDB.3020000@mib-infotech.co.nz> <48E003AC.5000306@mib-infotech.co.nz> <48E036F4.3040609@mib-infotech.co.nz> <48E046C3.2080001@mib-infotech.co.nz> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200809/252 X-Sequence-Number: 31565 On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 9:08 PM, John Huttley wrote: > Ah yess... actually I can get the Kingston stuff locally. > However at the moment I'm happily married and want to keep it that way! > > Everything is in pairs too. Actually its a lot cheaper than when it first > came out, but still > a lot more than your corner shop DDR-2 stuff. I don't mean to keep arguing here, but it's not any more expensive than the same speed DDR-2 667MHz memory. for ECC memory memory, they're almost the same price. http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=PowerEdge%201950 That's memory for my Dell PowerEdge web server, and it's $105.99 for 2 1Gig sticks. $56.99 * 2 = $113.98. It's only 7.99 more. I get the point about not wanting to anger the wife, but maybe if you ask for it nice for Christmas? :)