Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3414164FDAA for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:20:17 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45380-04 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:20:05 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A363164FDA6 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 11:20:05 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so1217403wah.19 for ; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OmXJbc31boAAZqdz0Y1Urjt9hSOk4tVmQ7mww8EVTfU=; b=QoMvhszp6bqV3iKdUkU1HgSrsrjtdTDWmhlKgwtalyNcE371qZbzQJ03wzICC4AXdr GWMzGeprma7vWsVK6YWQyKyLCFFDvK0157hCQGkpLhWUSFjEr0U3JvUlRdMVsTHoMrrz PjcG3tzkFaZcW5C+zKZRwdxY3j6+8S0RWbvOs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=kUghyrsHbFgDuL19rKCPa+YamR0UecaAWcrqDsNWNccC3qi1x9uAiYhLb3bpE3KTCp 7JyOBa8uOuwCJB343uLq1KyxglFEqioAZllM6ADsKtodmYG6ap5p70iTGOHHgEGVcsRy wP/h4yBNxg+R4sTJPkvWijOiABMVPxy+Rm6EQ= Received: by 10.115.90.1 with SMTP id s1mr6842340wal.214.1223994003036; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.39.11 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 08:20:02 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "Ang Chin Han" Subject: Re: Drupal and PostgreSQL - performance issues? Cc: "Ivan Sergio Borgonovo" , pgsql-general@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <8c8854360810140647n58abc9bend377e0e234dd39a9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2434A118-CEFA-43A9-BA88-006EC1F80326@hoegh.org> <200810122214.53558.uwe@oss4u.com> <20081013090228.248a665f@dawn.webthatworks.it> <20081014114011.0ebe495a@dawn.webthatworks.it> <8c8854360810140647n58abc9bend377e0e234dd39a9@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/534 X-Sequence-Number: 138783 On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Ang Chin Han wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Ivan Sergio Borgonovo >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 20:45:39 -0600 >>> "Joshua Tolley" wrote: >>> >>> Premise: >>> I'm not sustaining that the "default" answers are wrong, but they are >>> inadequate. >>> BTW the OP made a direct comparison of pgsql and mysql running >>> drupal. That's a bit different than just asking: how can I improve >>> PostgreSQL performances. >> >> Sadly, no one has run any meaningful benchmarks so far. > > Not sure about "meaningful", but: > http://2bits.com/articles/benchmarking-postgresql-vs-mysql-performance-using-drupal-5x.html Again, a read only benchmark against the front page hardly counts as a meaningful. And 5 concurrent is pretty small anyway.