Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2CA6501DB for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:29:19 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61017-01 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:29:13 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DEE6501FF for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:28:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so631216wfc.28 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:28:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3aXA11VpeT0WbI5gPhLbA3ZM9YUrCKVjhmj3umyYoxY=; b=Qbq8IQDxgg16+fXPdGK4A1Z9g0k9q6gu2djREU+pv/p9swPDiskAaad5wLtHEbCSSo ytGZ2Lg6oPcWjU5Z0GtVclMtexhlfJr/sROSCtyMotisdVd6N39x/a9RL2emfkLTjM4y WrFBOjcRzSQCrHa5uMiALM680vxFglwTn/loY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MLOXShutaRm4aa5NjTlWc0Mm+SzO63B4Bau/T3b9IFNIo8l7FS/Oiu9hwewfgOrGu8 i9sWBiy5cMx5tn3YLzRtOLWcR7QNbGT7lOYQVDN+1AXKiif6vr/oC8dKzcLeL1VNi/FJ BUSC1o3N8ShZe8g+BXIA7Q/aal0RMkqkV82yQ= Received: by 10.114.46.11 with SMTP id t11mr3395801wat.211.1224253738063; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.39.11 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2008 07:28:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 08:28:57 -0600 From: "Scott Marlowe" To: "Martin Gainty" Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To Cc: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikkel_H=F8gh?=" , pgsql-general In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081017072017.1039f895.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <74826FB8-0529-486A-A6A5-4C6DE161D3C9@hoegh.org> <20081017080103.ba3ca072.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <20081017084917.f6840c44.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <48F89586.2040905@kkmfg.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200810/765 X-Sequence-Number: 139014 On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Martin Gainty wrote: > free unfettered and open discussion without interference from ANY entity is > a requirement of a democracy > the REAL question is ..is this a democracy??? No, it's a well mostly well behaved meritocracy. And I prefer that. I believe that free and unfettered discussion is important to many quality forms of governance, not just democracies. I really do prefer the way this list works because when I hit reply all to a discussion with "Bob Smith and Postgresql-general" I know that Bob gets a direct answer from me, now, when he needs it at 2am when his servers are puking their data out their gigE ports, and the rest of the list gets it whenever the mailing list server can get around to it.