Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA87564FD24
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:52:32 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 54861-01 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:52:30 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com
 [209.85.146.179])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C1464FCC0
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:52:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j4so674309wah.19
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
	:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	bh=5ipd/h73gJv8abCKFONEC/f1k/uh3bNqmUvojtx6D6o=;
	b=oXAZQDkzjk6l5aL1LCrLwtGWKCSF5n1o/wSMqbDLO3YvplnVzTrLGeZNlSmM+S4mdB
	iU238fb9jkVU51zUJrwznK1Xq4OEHMhT4WqlH8ye39Up6XCETwJQYWD3lEfnhfP5j6Og
	Zz8EYHRi5M6ua0Tn4JxO4DYkDFUDm2/973tCc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
	:references;
	b=fM9wEIp0UdMuba6tmm1ocupX95rCgaImWZYmnoOonu2iiagb2qlx0LOeZprg6bHIus
	TDc1/gF4I7+lFauMwYAs95Kag521uqrW62QAgdvotF+gNJjz2xqjdfNPAlEvWRcchag1
	VpFwXfKIrC2rTCKAVOMsZNDiCD0mdAEPJxOZA=
Received: by 10.114.184.9 with SMTP id h9mr4415750waf.151.1224395549023;
	Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.39.11 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 22:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <dcc563d10810182252rdb3307aw8c1bf3168598d3ba@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:52:28 -0600
From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: "H. Hall" <hhall1001@reedyriver.com>
Subject: Re: Postgres Performance on CPU limited Platforms
Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
In-Reply-To: <48CAAFCD.4040408@reedyriver.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <48CA78F9.5090902@novatech-llc.com>
	<48CAAFCD.4040408@reedyriver.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200810/101
X-Sequence-Number: 31682

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:07 PM, H. Hall <hhall1001@reedyriver.com> wrote:
>
> Hmmm  ARM/XScale, 64MB.  Just curious. Are you running a Postgres server on
> a pocket pc or possibly a cell phone?
>

I would think SQLite would be a better choice on that kind of thing.
Unless you're trying to run really complex queries maybe.

-- When fascism comes to America, it will be draped in a flag and
carrying a cross - Sinclair Lewis