Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038E66355AC for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:58:58 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80523-08 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:58:53 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ew0-f167.google.com (mail-ew0-f167.google.com [209.85.219.167]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5987634C0B for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2009 14:58:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ewy11 with SMTP id 11so239954ewy.19 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:58:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AXfhtUrieRrJ+i5ICBRmnlTts7UaEBupRS0IC0jpkYE=; b=sQWMtgSp8RTGCWMHKwy7zlax/1Ix31opUACdukjx964JTn3rZCp1QnobFwltATsGDM QZOGdo8e90tNRLjZPfRMTaNTGP8S77bonM+H3TaN9Jyfo4al0twcwZ5sgOmy1Wuhqwhn VY+7vpfyqsZCCOQKg14Dd7apko8krsPTIGF1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=djUoTJ2WcWbRkmrYrbBXNjMB+I71YdxmMO3kwxpG85slQr4H9/dR1Ox8V1OxRvE7/a vS+3O3Gr12RtLuDMM9aimmT2zy2lCT/PbtmJsCucFOW2atpCnXeoYuq7hH9FW2QSXryL 8uhx3X8rrmzkBgcwuoIY2vtCySt0c/vt0RTcQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.91.7 with SMTP id o7mr4657681ebb.39.1238608729130; Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:58:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <49D31E85.8050405@paradise.net.nz> <49D37CAA.6080100@ummon.com> <49D3932D.3080808@ummon.com> <49D39AFA.8000700@ummon.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 11:58:49 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Raid 10 chunksize From: Scott Marlowe To: Matthew Wakeling Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.003 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/24 X-Sequence-Number: 33391 On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Matthew Wakeling wro= te: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Greg Smith wrote: >> >> The only real way to know if a UPS is working right is to actually detac= h >> power and confirm the battery still works, which is downtime nobody ever >> feels is warranted for a production system. =A0Then, one day the power d= ies, >> the UPS battery doesn't work to spec anymore, and you're done. > > Most decent servers have dual power supplies, and they should really be > connected to two independent UPS units. You can test them one by one with= out > much risk of bringing down your server. Yeah, our primary DB servers have three PSes and can run on any two just fine. We have three power busses each coming from a different UPS at the hosting center.