DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=enZqQKrtz54ExBt8nyDpPdYrr0BnM5T7P7dsnA8xN1xewnSiZ3X/JhTpA8/3cduYsg
	K65ayj0Y2H+mf4a6FKHetHBOjMDFCkn21iGC2ACe2Pm3ybfsBrmvu3a4sFmaHbsd3n8U
	cQ5XAjaKl2Qj2bU4SjPxDmSGTSJA7PE8zzr94=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100202162046.GA4020@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <20100202045701.93A404B1C73@mail175-236.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
	<dcc563d11002020812t4a3ce023q2049630313a8f531@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100202162046.GA4020@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:27:26 -0700
Message-ID: <dcc563d11002020827u2dfe579cv9217f64b0ceb98b2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: the jokes for pg concurrency write performance
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: wyx6fox@sina.com, pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe escribi=F3:
>> 2010/2/1 =A0<wyx6fox@sina.com>:
>
>> Let's rewrite this assertion:
>> > * joke 1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row b=
y the
>> > foreign key . a big big big performance killer , i think this is a stu=
pid
>> > design .
>>
>> "problem #1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row =
by the
>> foreign key . a big big big performance killer. =A0"
>
> Yeah, if it had been written this way I could have told him that this
> is not the case since 8.1, but since he didn't, I simply skipped his
> emails.

I wonder if having paid technical support to abuse leads to people
thinking they can treat other people like crap and get the answer they
want anyway...  Well, we'll see if the OP can write a non-flame-filled
inquiry on their performance issues or not.