X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724A79DCD5C
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2005 13:18:36 -0400 (AST)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 17963-08
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2005 13:18:33 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50979DCC9C
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Fri,  2 Dec 2005 13:18:33 -0400 (AST)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id 7684133692; Fri,  2 Dec 2005 18:18:33 +0100 (MET)
From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: Re: Open request for benchmarking input (fwd)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:19:25 -0500
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <dmpvl7$16sr$1@news.hub.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0512012331480.2807@qnivq.ynat.uz>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 required=5 tests=[none]
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200512/70
X-Sequence-Number: 15891


"David Lang" <dlang@invendra.net> wrote
> here are the suggestions from the MySQL folks, what additional tests 
> should I do.
>

I think the tests you list are enough in this stage,

Regards,
Qingqing