X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2459FA5C8
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:49:02 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 16929-05 for
	<pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:48:48 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (floppy.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238F39F9CAA
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jun 2006 01:48:48 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id 54AB330955; Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:48:47 +0200 (MET DST)
From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.hackers
Subject: Re: Test request for Stats collector performance improvement
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:48:27 +0800
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <e6td7b$2oqb$1@news.hub.org>
References: <e6t8ga$1u5j$1@news.hub.org>
	<200606160357.k5G3vN112941@candle.pha.pa.us>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200606/792
X-Sequence-Number: 85025


"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote
>
> Any idea why there is such a variance in the result?  The second run
> looks quite slow.
>

No luck so far. It is quite repeatble in my machine -- runing times which
show a long execution time: 2, 11, 14, 21 ... But when I do strace, the
weiredness disappered totally.  Have we seen any strange things like this
before?

Regards,
Qingqing