Received: from localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BEB9FB1E4
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:49:18 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.251]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 20300-01 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:49:09 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B57E9F9F44
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:49:09 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106)
	id 29532308E7; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:49:08 +0200 (MET DST)
From: "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec.register@sympatico.ca>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: Re: Is ODBC that slow?
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:49:22 -0400
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <ehm1oe$9ob$1@news.hub.org>
References: <ehbi15$2mhm$1@news.hub.org>
	<20061021023211.GA20508@alvh.no-ip.org>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.055 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200610/503
X-Sequence-Number: 21632

> Try Command Prompt's ODBC driver.  Lately it has been measured to be
> consistently faster than psqlODBC.
>
> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/odbcng

Thanks,

I tried this, but via Access it always reports a login (username/password) 
to db failure.  However, this a an Alpha - is there an "official" release I 
should be waiting for? It's not clear to me whether this is a commercial 
product or not.

Carlo