Received: from localhost (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.187])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144229FA489
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:47:31 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.187]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 88879-10 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:47:25 -0300 (ADT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com
 [64.233.184.231])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A899FA446
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:47:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so243720wri
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.90.75.10 with SMTP id x10mr3073735aga.1187286445376;
	Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.95.11 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 10:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f3be18fa0708161047s8accedbl9ad6f05c9e4b3c22@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:47:25 +0300
From: "Michael Ben-Nes" <miki@epoch.co.il>
To: "PostgreSQL Performance" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Integrated perc 5/i
In-Reply-To: <20070816164347.GB32094@uio.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_78580_30762230.1187286445194"
References: <f3be18fa0708160126i62a857d6ubd993546bc3c197b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20070816164347.GB32094@uio.no>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200708/162
X-Sequence-Number: 26292

------=_Part_78580_30762230.1187286445194
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for all the answers.
It seems its a capable card.
Did any one changed the default stripe of 128kb ?


On 8/16/07, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:26:52AM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
> > Does any one have any experience with RAID 10 & perc 5/i ?
>
> Without having done PostgreSQL benchmarking, we have a 2950 with four SATA
> disks in RAID 10 (and two SAS disks in RAID 1), and have not seen any
> performance issues.
>
> /* Steinar */
> --
> Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
>



-- 
--------------------------------------------------
Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and  Director.
http://www.epoch.co.il - weaving the Net.
Cellular: 054-4848113
--------------------------------------------------

------=_Part_78580_30762230.1187286445194
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Thanks for all the answers.<br>It seems its a capable card.<br>Did any one changed the default stripe of 128kb ?<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Steinar H. Gunderson</b> &lt;
<a href="mailto:sgunderson@bigfoot.com">sgunderson@bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 11:26:52AM +0300, Michael Ben-Nes wrote:
<br>&gt; Does any one have any experience with RAID 10 &amp; perc 5/i ?<br><br>Without having done PostgreSQL benchmarking, we have a 2950 with four SATA<br>disks in RAID 10 (and two SAS disks in RAID 1), and have not seen any
<br>performance issues.<br><br>/* Steinar */<br>--<br>Homepage: <a href="http://www.sesse.net/">http://www.sesse.net/</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--------------------------------------------------
<br>Michael Ben-Nes - Internet Consultant and&nbsp;&nbsp;Director.<br><a href="http://www.epoch.co.il">http://www.epoch.co.il</a> - weaving the Net.<br>Cellular: 054-4848113<br>--------------------------------------------------

------=_Part_78580_30762230.1187286445194--