X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31C69DCA79 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:46:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13153-04 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:46:29 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5049DCA18 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:46:25 -0400 (AST) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i30so338624wxd for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:46:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WkoqE7fpulKg5q80RtjjNNC/6hgYRW2pWvwXuCSuRhadmz78PUfM0fCioF8FQb6fo4ppap33w9jXJ4pjWDEYsXWk6kU9S6BvLGgN3nwOehSlxrHFzlQIfN06kRObcCp2AzS9EHf0QryP95TO1I7/DNAkt7Ow6LOlmeqKDHQw3jw= Received: by 10.70.77.6 with SMTP id z6mr2593883wxa; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:46:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.128.2 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:46:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:46:26 -0600 From: "Matthew Nuzum" Reply-To: newz@bearfruit.org To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 1 TB of memory In-Reply-To: <8B16F5C8-DFC8-4694-902C-AE584E490530@pervasive.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <8B16F5C8-DFC8-4694-902C-AE584E490530@pervasive.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.15 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150] X-Spam-Score: 0.15 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200603/257 X-Sequence-Number: 17694 On 3/16/06, Jim Nasby wrote: > PostgreSQL tuned to the max and still too slow? Database too big to > fit into memory? Here's the solution! http://www.superssd.com/ > products/tera-ramsan/ > > Anyone purchasing one will be expected to post benchmarks! :) Pricing is tight-lipped, but searching shows $1.85 /GB. That's close to $500,000 for 250GB. One report says a person paid $219,000 for 32GB and 1TB costs "well over $1,000,000." But they "guarantee the performance." Too rich for me. -- Matthew Nuzum www.bearfruit.org