Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go41y-0007Ga-UE for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:20:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go41x-0005hh-RF for pgsql-performance@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:20:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go41x-0005hQ-Gk for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:20:41 +0000 Received: from mx2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.215]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1go41u-00089Z-Mq for pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:20:40 +0000 Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFDCCA18E1; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:20:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter05.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.123]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id Cru65dUNKtIv; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:20:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Subject: Re: upgrade from 9.6 to 10/11 From: Laurenz Albe To: Mariel Cherkassky , pgsql-performance@lists.postgresql.org Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:20:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cybertec Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Mariel Cherkassky wrote: > I'm planning our db upgrade from 9.6. Basically I wanted to check how stable > is pg11 version. I'm considering upgrading from 9.6 to 10 and then to 11 immediatly. > Is there a way to upgrade directly to 11 and jump on 10. v11 is stable, else the PGDG would not release it. There is no need to upgrade via v10, I recommend that you upgrade from 9.6 to v11 directly, either via dump/restore or with pg_upgrade. https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/upgrading.html Yours, Laurenz Albe -- Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com