Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.191]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A659F936E for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:22:44 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.191]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99105-09 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:22:38 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from floppy.pyrenet.fr (news.pyrenet.fr [194.116.145.2]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723509F9BDE for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 12:22:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: by floppy.pyrenet.fr (Postfix, from userid 106) id 9127731440; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:22:37 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Carlo Stonebanks" X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Performance on 8CPU's and 32GB of RAM Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 11:23:05 -0400 Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <20070904230639.GA23731@alvh.no-ip.org> <46DE66CF.9000903@theendofthetunnel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org In-Reply-To: <46DE66CF.9000903@theendofthetunnel.de> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16480 To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.000, BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200709/50 X-Sequence-Number: 26595 > Right, additionally NTFS is really nothing to use on any serious disc > array. Do you mean that I will not see any big improvement if I upgrade the disk subsystem because the client is using NTFS (i.e. Windows)