Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC443650EA9 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:36:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44876-05 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:35:58 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.239]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C00650EA7 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 22:36:03 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so210254rvf.43 for ; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:36:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=X4+DkphiHYOpnWFf0QkzRudecr1UBOMtcCY9U1R+lvk=; b=A8+79kWvqCTzM9s3Um4J8bR3d9yEmNfWBN4wv1rpMA0dwd8bW4J263MuDFpNBzQn2b e9bnDf9PYINne97JX0b9S8U3iPcy3i+NYrlX6jK2mjLrlK2XXry5Yu/Frrqu+NpnSe2C ieDImRts3V5a8ld6T8DEVob5LwLjPaTgfGqE4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=MiBT7fQ26T91qJovQaD5/wLbKW+bU+45QGt0vZU+6sP1vDk0aHc75NpTcoOMI1rtaO yXN/pQoTq3t9XWkBRe4JCcnJMz2NdbNhMy7Rtk+QGuoScb8ixMrPa9ytX6OA5f5xCRv1 bj1liu3smfu8MOittH56lvlrorjp+x1XwSevg= Received: by 10.140.201.1 with SMTP id y1mr4035208rvf.200.1214962562218; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.128.9 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 18:36:02 -0700 From: "Jeffrey Baker" To: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" Subject: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/13 X-Sequence-Number: 30613 On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Andrej Ricnik-Bay wrote: > On 02/07/2008, Jeffrey Baker wrote: > >> Red Hat and its clones. The other problem is the 80GB model is too >> small to hold my entire DB, Although it could be used as a tablespace >> for some critical tables. But hey, it's fast. > And when/if it dies, please give us a rough guestimate of its > life-span in terms of read/write cycles. Sounds exciting, though! Yeah. The manufacturer rates it for 5 years in constant use. I remain skeptical.