Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC7D650281 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:10:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31467-04 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:10:40 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.184]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 199766501F6 for ; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 13:10:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k40so446448rnd.0 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:10:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AF19C2VpPWwChOvkc+j7TihdK0QGKJpObmniCc2mZT0=; b=SEEXHdM53vEV2BNWxCyox90Y+OMhTnVuyEyihA5B5p0pU3rd6Y2uebDDjxOW2XwMmj E0sHTam9ZGLyqT5D4q3Cgm+mP2UKYICvZGMRTtsif9L6oTZYKDhrNmaGtTgiQqQhyO/e Go2VV4paGgEyBjgTUuA0ObMReAJh5omXvxUyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=NcNGYujaIAkEMbhF1nf7m7bo68jyqJdcjCtPwjB5gUJKF0mDn7R64Km9LQr9+GkRwa ADWT/JQ7Hqe4O3fNiSMEWthXQBRb+YKsnhBxkmR1ZPDmkIaWnOXXFBugDnABo1jJeL+A aDFeZuofTKabdsRM4cJu+DAxQ9TuC2qGB3b24= Received: by 10.142.213.9 with SMTP id l9mr1375102wfg.2.1215447037493; Mon, 07 Jul 2008 09:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.242.21 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 09:10:37 -0700 From: "Jeffrey Baker" To: "Merlin Moncure" Subject: Re: Fusion-io ioDrive Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/62 X-Sequence-Number: 30662 On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Jeffrey Baker wrote: >>> Service Time Percentile, millis >>> R/W TPS R-O TPS 50th 80th 90th 95th >>> RAID 182 673 18 32 42 64 >>> Fusion 971 4792 8 9 10 11 >> >> Someone asked for bonnie++ output: >> >> Block output: 495MB/s, 81% CPU >> Block input: 676MB/s, 93% CPU >> Block rewrite: 262MB/s, 59% CPU >> >> Pretty respectable. In the same ballpark as an HP MSA70 + P800 with >> 25 spindles. > > You left off the 'seeks' portion of the bonnie++ results -- this is > actually the most important portion of the test. Based on your tps > #s, I'm expecting seeks equiv of about 10 10k drives in configured in > a raid 10, or around 1000-1500. They didn't publish any prices so > it's hard to say if this is 'cost competitive'. I left it out because bonnie++ reports it as "+++++" i.e. greater than or equal to 100000 per second. -jwb