Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0B29FC2FF
	for <pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:08:36 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 77584-06 for
	<pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:08:11 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919679FC258
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:08:33 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72])
	by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9VA8T03023503
	for <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>;
	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 07:08:29 -0300 (ADT)
	(envelope-from news@news.hub.org)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by news.hub.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l9V9dNG3014829
	for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org;
	Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:39:23 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news)
From: cluster <skrald@amossen.dk>
X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance
Subject: Re: Two fast queries get slow when combined
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 10:39:24 +0100
Organization: Hub.Org Networking Services
Lines: 6
Message-ID: <fg9ig9$eav$2@news.hub.org>
References: <fg85ae$1740$1@news.hub.org> <8481.1193803542@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.hub.org
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023)
In-Reply-To: <8481.1193803542@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Archive-Number: 200710/373
X-Sequence-Number: 27395

> You are lying to us about how those queries were posed to Postgres
> (and no I don't feel a need to explain how I know).

Sorry. The "lying" was not intended as explained in my reply to Heikku.

Thanks for the tips anyways.