Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905C263375F for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:33:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21017-09 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:33:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BC16336F9 for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2010 08:33:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NTaVA-0003yo-Uj for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:33:08 +0100 Received: from ppp-93-104-22-2.dynamic.mnet-online.de ([93.104.22.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:33:08 +0100 Received: from spam_eater by ppp-93-104-22-2.dynamic.mnet-online.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:33:08 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org From: Thomas Kellerer Subject: Re: PG optimization question Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:32:49 +0100 Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <4B485975.70506@zhukcity.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-93-104-22-2.dynamic.mnet-online.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 In-Reply-To: <4B485975.70506@zhukcity.ru> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.589 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_DATE_PAST_20XX=3.188 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201001/160 X-Sequence-Number: 37040 Nickolay wrote on 09.01.2010 11:24: > it would be pretty hard with one table because of blocking What do you man with "because of blocking"? Thomas