Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88221632F00 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:36:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44447-09 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 22:35:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B94E632B88 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:35:53 -0300 (ADT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o37MZmxI021250 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:35:48 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o37M9YWb011663 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:09:34 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news) From: Lew X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Using high speed swap to improve performance? Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:09:36 -0400 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net X-User-ID: wyO+DN6srV1qVz8qJEN7pF/dZS3VSKpZscwZNkvwlvY= In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mtkf57kwo4al1NldoreaUdkGOXA= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100317) X-NNTP-Posting-Host: gRC5DOhK3/FqvlQetxSirRX128172ambr4n1Aq4YWeU= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.001 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/101 X-Sequence-Number: 38351 Christiaan Willemsen wrote: >>> About a year ago we setup a machine with sixteen 15k disk spindles on >>> Solaris using ZFS. Now that Oracle has taken Sun, and is closing up Solaris, >>> we want to move away (we are more familiar with Linux anyway). Lew wrote: >> What evidence do you have that Oracle is "closing up" Solaris? Scott Marlowe wrote: > I don't think the other poster mean shutting down solaris, that would > be insane. I think he meant closing it, as in taking it closed > source, which there is ample evidence for. Oh, that makes sense. Yes, it does seem that they're doing that. Some press hints that Oracle might keep OpenSolaris going, forked from the for-pay product. If that really is true, I speculate that Oracle might be emulating the strategy in such things as Apache Geronimo - turn the open-source side loose on the world under a license that lets you dip into it for code in the closed-source product. Innovation flows to the closed-source product rather than from it. This empowers products like WebSphere Application Server, which includes a lot of reworked Apache code in the persistence layer, the web-services stack, the app-server engine and elsewhere. I don't know Oracle's plans, but that sure would be a good move for them. For me, I am quite satisfied with Linux. I don't really know what the value proposition is for Solaris anyway. -- Lew