Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CB8632BF6 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:26:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29352-03 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 23:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C55463264E for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:26:04 -0300 (ADT) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o6QNPwYt090723 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:25:58 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o6QN3j5A004766 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:03:45 -0300 (ADT) (envelope-from news) From: Lew X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Big difference in time returned by EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ... AND SELECT ... Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:03:58 -0400 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 17 Message-ID: References: <4C4D5220.9010101@postnewspapers.com.au> <4C4D547E.50905@gmail.com> <4C4D5BE9.6040808@postnewspapers.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@albasani.net X-User-ID: uGMj32xezf+6OnRNmZntHw1I1Zp290cM1JWDDt0Fhe8= In-Reply-To: <4C4D5BE9.6040808@postnewspapers.com.au> Cancel-Lock: sha1:InRXGYupyD8BkgcihM8JAf4ZKBI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100528 Thunderbird/3.0.5 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: mMX+G8x0qalIGtXAycE0tbLUbJa3TGdC6ACzmo0c/Yg= To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.79 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201007/411 X-Sequence-Number: 39800 Piotr Gasidło wrote: >>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ... >>>> Total runtime: 4.782 ms >>>> Time: 25,970 ms Vitalii Tymchyshyn wrote: >> Actually it's 20ms, so I suspect your point about planning time is correct. Craig Ringer wrote: > Oh, a commas-as-fraction-separator locale. > > That makes sense. Thanks for the catch. Strangely, the runtime is shown with a period for the separator, though. -- Lew