Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033541336971 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56433-09 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED24133616B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0VCu8kX037314 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:56:08 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0VCSBq2083974 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:28:11 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news) From: Lew X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter? Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:28:39 -0500 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com> <4D463CCE.90806@vmsinfo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D463CCE.90806@vmsinfo.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:RssSUHuMX/mNCR+PLhUSZ4ms4h4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="hY9Fm8GQstXrzr8gR+i1GJ2Q8kv6e+eey103NlJqAaJRiZxMSPGlTLpkfw7VCWUzw7XxkczxuO3S8brp78wqPfh4x/c9Q4/g+h2ebA3zPGTBnT8A3tvqF3J64Wfw5Nlp"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201101/347 X-Sequence-Number: 42134 On 01/30/2011 11:38 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote: > Mark Felder wrote: >> Why do you feel the need to defrag your *nix box? >> >> > Let's stick to the original question and leave my motivation for some other > time. Have you used the product? If you have, I'd be happy to hear about your > experience with it. That seems a little harsh. You post to a discussion group but want to suppress discussion? Maybe that works with paid tech-support staff, but here ... -- Lew Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre. .___________. |###] | [###| |##/ | *\##| |#/ * | \#| |#----|----#| || | * || |o * | o| |_____|_____| |===========|