Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6200133616B for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:56:16 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44473-01 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 23:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEB21337B82 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:56:09 -0400 (AST) Received: from news.hub.org (news.hub.org [200.46.204.72]) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0VNu9oM024731 for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:56:09 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news@news.hub.org) Received: (from news@localhost) by news.hub.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0VNespk095143 for pgsql-performance@postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 19:40:54 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from news) From: Lew X-Newsgroups: pgsql.performance Subject: Re: Any experience using "shake" defragmenter? Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 18:41:26 -0500 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: <4D45C607.4070101@vmsinfo.com> <4D463CCE.90806@vmsinfo.com> <4D471A13.20506@vmsinfo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4D471A13.20506@vmsinfo.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:hAgxMioQCMse3wS/+D3bJL8UwiI= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="TfiT8V4GZZXXJzIFNUDaP11cHngHErHAenfM9KyNVyNHWQwkoRrS8qkShpVfxX5OsRaFddVjEAcS+8/EP2c04lOa4C93te57m+xYzCBrfrePZARttl3DtTeoGhl25aDs"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201102/2 X-Sequence-Number: 42140 Please reply to the list with list business. On 01/31/2011 03:22 PM, Mladen Gogala wrote: > On 1/31/2011 7:28 AM, Lew wrote: >> That seems a little harsh. > Oh? How so? >> You post to a discussion group but want to >> suppress discussion? > > No, I just want to stick to the subject. My motivation for doing so, my > unhappy childhood or somebody's need for attention are not too important. If > you have had any experience with the product, I'd be extremely keen to learn > about it and grateful to you for sharing it. If not, then....well, I'll > explain my reasoning some other time. I have better things to do right now. > >> Maybe that works with paid tech-support staff, but here ... >> > Things have lived up to my expectation. Basically, the only people who replied > are those who have no experience with the product but apparently do have an > irresistible urge to discuss something that I am not particularly interested > in discussing. > I'm so very, very sorry that we insist on having a discussion instead of adhering to your ukase. Perhaps your dictatorial attitude discourages people from responding? I mean, Mark Felder asked a perfectly reasonable question and now you're all snarky. Well, a big "Harrumph!" to that! I wish you the best of luck. You'll need it with that attitude. -- Lew Ceci n'est pas une fenĂȘtre. .___________. |###] | [###| |##/ | *\##| |#/ * | \#| |#----|----#| || | * || |o * | o| |_____|_____| |===========|