Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tA9og-00E3dB-BB for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:25:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tA9ne-007N1c-Tr for pgsql-hackers@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:24:27 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) id 1tA9ne-007N1T-Jj for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:24:27 +0000 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <9erthalion6@gmail.com>) id 1tA9nc-0019EM-Nr for pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:24:25 +0000 Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a93c1cc74fdso623102666b.3 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:24:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731252262; x=1731857062; darn=lists.postgresql.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Oxa1AdVGqY440nuOLjy3J6+rSstQm8pRtJLjNAg+thI=; b=Er8IqKdBj5bRWGV1Elai7vhfHewe9TxTcxJgHpa3p1X0ztvCqvTT3pKAGgiuZHAnK7 nRhH0GwKOSDcWtxHrGOf7p3mVEvOyc2i0FFewfRUP6qqu6b+8ZRRYJFNUlIeim/eifJa a4D/gRyloJ+WI0Kq4qQkrPHokNShBp2NJ0ch/uY5lCE8wGCr/NxKxh/Wtz0yhSsbp01p j3k6IDtKDGjw9zBMi0SA841WHj0PF2VmyEzsgE2LZoEnvzXTIrzKvTkpQfPQvOFt8CeO 6mO2bbfuA2bn2cXpHdyGC6nPJ0Pb/Z5X8s8IzwyePi+9BV8EjG3U3CFI9LveS9y482Ri 9plw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731252262; x=1731857062; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Oxa1AdVGqY440nuOLjy3J6+rSstQm8pRtJLjNAg+thI=; b=G5jS+YEExsPH6eVEf+IcZs6GxB3u7HAOW5qxYbFydd2FC1CpvkdL7fQqADULndFelS MX7UAmJXw+1OrrrWngDDXtCVcPKGX5lVTVqFWEHDbNBX7Mtbo/7PfJaMFNWlxrCx+SC1 xtaK7XKAznHPY95K1Fgpvx5QJwj3ldgpDjPPLKCP+FbanZf+UCZjQh+3pFKQoqlt/XvN 5DwxW6idV6iGXhsOFpQSsEhGcbJU7QXOUHtkYM02IiNSKe0cEiLdSHulzPtGu5uS9G8E QiQAHjLuNhYsSMFV6nHFMJmQLHcNbJ7t6YhthM3TSV+uGyy/vYLJPM9A5R6i9no5A37o qYEg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVrySYdNtaEReod1ulT7rD1FG1wXIRYNp9a5yeDLb5y2P1YfcYMNrvJGwAsT/XzbMFO5cXI08s6ftiUEFgb@lists.postgresql.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywpsba73dPt2J34XsZcIVatYGAKMAl9S+YTR4Cig8Ubpzd0NVwI nQPlaENNQUIcScELys8SvWV3XlT9FWWRUjLHNNZR8sX+oGfF2dv5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHXCF0jDB42V5qJq3uEjsk0t7FH+Q5YcL3PFrYWz1Hkq3ZOQNHM+kIDLj5EqIg9lgCzIo2AWw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f8a:b0:a99:4136:5b07 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a9ef001c671mr799778066b.60.1731252261775; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:24:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from ddolgov-thinkpadt14sgen1.rmtde.csb (dslb-178-005-232-220.178.005.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [178.5.232.220]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a9ee0dc5e8fsm491499766b.107.2024.11.10.07.24.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Nov 2024 07:24:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 16:24:19 +0100 From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> To: Pavel Stehule Cc: Laurenz Albe , Erik Rijkers , Michael Paquier , Amit Kapila , DUVAL REMI , PostgreSQL Hackers Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Hi folks, Thanks for continuing this work. As a side note, I would like to mention how strange the situation in this CF item is. If I understand correctly, there are two hackers threads discussing the same patch, with recent patches posted in both of them. This is obviously confusing, e.g. the main concern from another thread, about names clashing, wasn't even mentioned in this one. Is it possible to reconcile development in one thread?