X-Original-To: pgsql-performance-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C6C56679 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:20:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29965-08 for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:20:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from boutiquenumerique.com (boutiquenumerique.com [82.67.9.10]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A565660C for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: (qmail 21552 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2005 11:20:32 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (boutiquenumerique-lists@192.168.0.4) by boutiquenumerique.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2005 11:20:32 +0100 To: "Greg Stark" , "Josh Berkus" Cc: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: What needs to be done for real Partitioning? References: <200503191202.38089.josh@agliodbs.com> <87br9ehmja.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:20:23 +0100 From: PFC Organization: =?iso-8859-15?Q?La_Boutique_Num=E9rique?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87br9ehmja.fsf@stark.xeocode.com> User-Agent: Opera M2(BETA2)/8.0 (Linux, build 987) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.003 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200503/387 X-Sequence-Number: 11092 > It would also be reasonable to allow clustering individual partitions; > creating table or column constraints on some partitions and not others; I have a session mamagement which works like that, using views now. sessions.online is a table of the online sessions. It has a UNIQUE on user_id. sessions.archive contains all the closed sessions. Obviously it does not have a UNIQUE on user_id.